The Senate Judiciary Committee has met with two anonymous men who claim they sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford, not Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Committee members met with the first anonymous man Monday and Tuesday, according to a log of the committee’s activities obtained and published by reporters Wednesday evening:
1) Huge: This from new Judiciary timeline:
Mon. Sept. 24: “Committee staff have first interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his complaint. He submitted a written statement earlier in the day.”— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 27, 2018
2) Tues, Sept. 25: “Committee staff have a second interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He described his recollection of their interaction in some detail.”
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 27, 2018
3)Wed. Sept 26: “Committee staff receives a more in-depth written statement from the man interviewed twice previously who believes he, not Judge Kavanuagh, had the encounter in question with Dr. Ford.”
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 27, 2018
Sometime this week committee members also reportedly held a phone interview with a second man who issued claims similar to those of the first:
Senate Judiciary Rs release a Kavanaugh investigative summary that includes:
-an anonymous claim of rape fwded by Harris’ office
-two intvus & a written statement from a man “who believes he, not” Kav, assaulted Ford in 1982
-phone intvu w/a 2nd man who believes same as above— Elana Schor (@eschor) September 27, 2018
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/1045141912863338496
Call me crazy but the fact that two men confessed to raping Christine Ford seems like a huge story that should be covered everywhere. I'm not saying it definitely clears Kavanaugh — it's possible the guys are crazy — but it's an extremely significant detail, no?
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 27, 2018
While these allegations remain uncorroborated, they’ve thrown yet another wrench into Ford’s dubious allegations that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in high school over three decades ago.
The results of a polygraph test she reportedly took last month has been found to be littered with contradictions. None of the people whom she’s cited as corroborating witnesses have backed her claims. And she’s tried every trick possible to avoid testifying to Congress and being questioned under oath by an experienced sex crimes prosecutor.
So far nothing Ford’s claimed has held up to scrutiny. The same can be said of the allegations made by two others accusers, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick.
Though Ramirez claims Kavanaugh exposed himself to her during a party in college in either 1983 or 1984, the two corroborating witnesses she cited have denied being aware of any such behavior.
And though Swetnick claims she observed Kavanaugh take part in so-called “gang rape” parties, nobody else has spoken up about these rapes. It also remains unclear why she reportedly kept attending these parties despite knowing full well that “gang rapes” were occurring at them. It’s also been shown she herself has a troubling history of bad behavior.
Regarding the two men with whom the Senate Judiciary Committee spoke with this week, what remains unclear are their specific roles in the alleged assault. Did they each separately sexually assault Ford, or was it a joint effort?
What also remains unclear is why they would out themselves, given that the state where the assault allegedly happened, Maryland, has no statue of limitations on rape charges, meaning these men could conceivably wind up in prison sometime soon.
What’s interesting to social media users, however, is how the left has decided to automatically dismiss these claims:
Some ugly Dem on Shannon Bream immediately said she does not believe this guy! I guess it’s okay to immediately accept anyone against #JudgeBrettKavanaugh – but not for those debunking the allegations! A women’s sworn statement now carings more weight than a man’s! ??
— Trying2HaveFun (@Trump_Wins16) September 27, 2018
Dems will say he is a conservative agent paid to protect kavanaugh.
— Sully (@Draxarix) September 27, 2018
Guess if she can remember an event that happened 36 years ago, it’s possible that someone else can also remember that same event.
— Jaoana Dean (@Dean90066) September 27, 2018
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- INSIDER: ‘It’s been terrible’ – Strip clubs accused of drugging customers, swindling $1M as part of intricate scheme - March 28, 2024
- Scarborough FUMES over ‘little idiots’ at Fox, spews seething contempt for female hosts who call him ‘liberal’ - March 28, 2024
- Vanderbilt Univ. protest upended when 911 call goes out for tampon emergency, and that’s not the worst of it - March 28, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!