Listen to AG Lynch answer this doozy: Is there a LEGAL reason you won’t answer us, or you just don’t want to?

Rep. Randy Forbes held Attorney General Loretta Lynch‘s feet to the fire on Tuesday, during a hearing called by Republicans to question her, primarily on the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

The Virginia representative hammered Lynch, repeatedly asking her if there was any “legal prohibition” that stopped her from discussing the case with the same detail FBI Director James Comey had, as she danced around giving direct answers to questions about the probe all day.

She could cite no such restriction because, as Forbes put it, “there is no legal prohibition that can be cited here.”

Getting no satisfactory answers Forbes moved on to lambaste her for the Justice Department’s prosecution of the former Republican governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell.

Forbes asked Lynch why her “department launched everything you had against a Republican governor” but choose to punt on bringing an indictment against Clinton.

To no one’s surprise she danced around that question too.

[wpvideo 5g5YgIDp]


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Carmine Sabia


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles