The Supreme Court will take a case considering whether an Americans with Disabilities Act “tester” can sue a hotel for failing to offer disability accommodations without ever visiting, it announced Monday.
The case, Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, was filed by Deborah Laufer, who has targeted over 600 hotel owners and operators with federal lawsuits after finding their websites “insufficiently clear” about accessibility accommodations for people with disabilities, according to court documents. A federal district court in Maine dismissed her lawsuit based on lack of standing, but the First Circuit allowed the case to proceed.
Though Laufer had “no intent to use the information for anything but a lawsuit,” the First Circuit found her “feelings of frustration, humiliation, and second-class citizenry” sufficient to grant standing to sue, given that they are “‘downstream consequences’ and ‘adverse effects’ of the informational injury she experienced.”
The Supreme Court agreed to take up Acheson Hotels’ appeal on Monday. Acheson Hotels argues in its petition for a writ of certiorari that the case is of “immense practical importance” because of its implications for small businesses, often small hotels or bed-and-breakfasts, which can be pushed into bankruptcy by Laufer’s lawsuits.
“A cottage industry has arisen in which uninjured plaintiffs lob ADA lawsuits of questionable merit, while using the threat of attorney’s fees to extract settlement payments,” the petition states. “These lawsuits have burdened small businesses, clogged the judicial system, and undermined the Executive Branch’s exclusive authority to enforce federal law.”
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Surveillance state’: Federal judge slams decision to uphold university’s bias reporting policy in dissent - May 31, 2023
- Small business owner sues over grant program open to everyone except straight white men - May 31, 2023
- The U.S. gave Chinese scientists thousands during COVID for ethics training, addressing ‘research misconduct’ - May 31, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.