The provocative new documentary from the Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh has caused a major stir with “woke” media leftists, and a furious campaign to discredit “What Is A Woman” is in full swing with Rolling Stone magazine wailing about transphobia while pressuring social media companies to discontinue taking ad money for the film.
With backlash growing by the day against the promotion of transgenderism, drag queen story hours and the teaching of sexually degenerate concepts to children, it’s not exactly a surprise that the activist left which has polluted American society for years would come out strongly against Walsh’s movie which has caught fire with their obvious objective being to smear and suppress it and that is exactly what Rolling Stone calls for in its hit piece.
According to the outlet, “The film, which premiered on the Daily Wire’s website earlier this month, faced controversy leading up to its release. Now, the Daily Wire has bought ads on major social media platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram, to promote the film — and so far, even though the documentary seems to violate TikTok and Meta’s policies against hate speech. Though the platforms prohibit dehumanizing, mocking, and/or hateful speech about transgender people, the ads have been allowed to stay.”
The Daily Wire has bought ads on major social media platforms to promote their right-wing transphobic doc — even though it seems to violate TikTok and Meta’s policies against hate speech. https://t.co/y1yrVyqQfV
— Rolling Stone (@RollingStone) June 11, 2022
Rolling Stone also provides a voice to the powerful homosexual lobby which absolutely hates Walsh’s movie.
“National LGBTQ organization GLAAD feels that it’s contradictory for these platforms to allow these sorts of ads, especially during a time when they claim to be uplifting and highlighting queer content. “Social media companies are in the midst of honoring Pride month by loudly sharing how they support LGBTQ people, while simultaneously profiting off of ads for a video project that is built off of lies and misinformation about our community,” a spokesperson for the organization tells Rolling Stone. “These platforms can and must do more to take action and enforce their own rules regarding content that violates their own standards of accuracy and safety.”
Walsh pushed back, taking to Twitter to respond to Rolling Stone’s attack on his work.
“Today @RollingStone ran a hit piece about What Is A Woman, calling it transphobic propaganda. The funny thing is that we sent screeners to the writer of the piece, @MoisesFenty, and we can see that he watched zero percent of the film before arriving at this conclusion,” he wrote. “The editor of the piece, @elisabethgp, did a little better by watching a whole entire 11 percent before approving and publishing an article labeling the film “hateful” and “dehumanizing.”
The editor of the piece, @elisabethgp, did a little better by watching a whole entire 11 percent before approving and publishing an article labeling the film “hateful” and “dehumanizing.” pic.twitter.com/cGqyvc38ke
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 11, 2022
Walsh also challenged the outlet to describe the review process for the movie, “I’d like Rolling Stone to explain how they arrived at these damning conclusions despite not watching the movie. Do they make a habit of reviewing movies without watching them? How many other reviews were written this way? Or is mine the first? If so, why?”
I’d like Rolling Stone to explain how they arrived at these damning conclusions despite not watching the movie. Do they make a habit of reviewing movies without watching them? How many other reviews were written this way? Or is mine the first? If so, why?
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 11, 2022
He’s not going to get an answer from the author of the hit piece who locked down his Twitter account.
Update: Moises locked down his account within three minutes of being exposed as a hack propagandist pic.twitter.com/XxrgV8lQfn
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 11, 2022
Walsh also jabbed the Rolling Stone editor, “In fairness, Emily is swamped with all the news so she’s not able to inform herself about a subject before publishing an article about it.”
In fairness, Emily is swamped with all the news so she’s not able to inform herself about a subject before publishing an article about it https://t.co/g7fQcLSzO2
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 11, 2022
Once on the cutting edge of anti-establishment journalism, Rolling Stone continues what many see as a sad decline into a pathetic propaganda organ of corrupt establishment power and defender of degeneracy.
Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Mamdani appointee resigns after her anti-Semitic social media posts resurface - December 19, 2025
- Grinch Christmas card pulled from supermarket chain after transgender activist complains - December 19, 2025
- Trump trolls Biden, Obama in savage new plaques added to White House Presidential Walk of Fame - December 18, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
7 thoughts on “Matt Walsh rips Rolling Stone over hit piece on new movie: ‘He watched zero percent of the film’”
Comments are closed.

Grow up, move on, Rolling Stone magazine died a long time ago!
The people at Rolling Stone Mag. need to lay off the smoke if they dont know what a woman is. Wonder how their moms and wives feel about it.
Do not forget, Rolling Stone tried to make rock stars out of the Boston Marathon bombers. 50 years ago it was a music centered magazine. They should have kept it that way.
Allowing the children-butcher community to participate in a Q & A and then wishing they hadn’t is ‘unfair’ and ‘hateful’ because now that they see how stupid they are they wished they hadn’t.
Zombies and Evil hate the light.
Rolling Stone is crap! Used to be mostly about music. Now, not so much music, a lot of far crap!
Correction: Far left crap! But I think everyone understood.
I have not seen the movie so I am unable to comment on it. Apparently I don’t have ESP or second sight or whatever Rolling Stone has so they may comment on something they have never seen and thus know nothing about!!