Latest

Oklahoma Dem proposes mandatory vasectomies for boys until they reach ‘financial and emotional stability’

May 24, 2022 | | Print Article

Oklahoma is known for many things—tornadoes, sprawling agricultural fields, renowned college football teams, and being the home state of famous country music stars like Reba McEntire and Carrie Underwood.

And if one Democratic legislator gets his way, the Sooner State may soon be known for something else: requiring mandatory vasectomies for males upon reaching the age of puberty. Not exactly the sort of thing calculated to attract newcomers to one’s state, but perhaps that was the idea all along.

Oklahoma State Representative Mickey Dollens (not to be confused with Micky Dolenz, lead vocalist for The Monkees), appeared last week on the Oklahoma state House’s floor to propose a new piece of legislation in response to the state’s recent abortion bill. The bill is considered the country’s “most restrictive abortion bill” by liberal media outlets, and it does indeed ban abortion at the point of fertilization, therefore essentially outlawing the practice.

Oklahoma’s Republican governor Kevin Stitt has previously pledged to sign any pro-life legislation that appears on his desk and is widely expected to sign the bill into law in the coming days.

“I would invite you to co-author a bill that I’m considering next year that would mandate that each male, when they reach puberty, get a mandatory vasectomy that’s only reversible when they reach the point of financial and emotional stability,” Rep. Dollens said in his remarks on the state House floor. “If you think that’s crazy, then I think that maybe you understand how 50% of Oklahomans feel, as well.”

Dollens provided no citation for that “50%” statistic, but he continued to make his case in what was evidently an attempt to burnish his liberal bona fides and perhaps launch his career onto a Washington-bound trajectory.

“HB4327 allows people to sue doctors for performing an abortion and defines life at the moment of ‘fertilization,’” he wrote. “Here’s an idea: mandatory vasectomies—if signed into law would be the first Oklahoma statute to control the male reproductive system. No more unwanted pregnancies.”

Undoubtedly the proposal is intended to be humorous and is a transparent attempt to “own” state Republicans, yet some contend it’s not a terrible idea—particularly for those irresponsible fathers who shirk their obligations to their children. But a good old-fashioned “shotgun wedding,” of the kind that worked so well in the old days, might do the trick without the need for invasive surgeries.

Dollens went on to reiterate his case on Twitter:

“‘Don’t tread on me but I’ll tread on thee’ is what I’m hearing from a lot of angry males who want government to control female reproductive rights but not theirs,” he wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mickey Dollens is a daydream believer if he thinks that odious piece of legislation stands a snowball’s chance in hell of passing in Oklahoma’s state House, and he even conceded the point in an MSNBC interview, acknowledging it was a “tongue-in-cheek” stunt.

“The party of so-called limited government and personal freedom has become the party of an intrusion,” Dollens said in the interview. “I’ll be on the record to say I don’t believe that government should regulate anyone’s reproductive system.”

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

$10
$15
$25
$50
Other
$
Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Todd Jaquith
Latest posts by Todd Jaquith (see all)

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

81 thoughts on “Oklahoma Dem proposes mandatory vasectomies for boys until they reach ‘financial and emotional stability’”

  1. Some have suggested castrating adult male Demonrats. Unfortunately, by the time they become “adults”, they are likely to already have, so to speak, plowed the field, leaving who knows how many little Demonrats in their wake.

  3. Cash making job for every American to earn and work online. earns more than $15k every month with this home based job. i made $18521 from this job in my spare time after my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page…… http://www.LiveJob247.com

  6. Let’s do one better, how about castrating all registered Demonrat voters so they can’t reproduce little Demonrats. These people are freaking nuts, and it is hard going to sleep at night knowing they have there hands on the controls of power.

  7. This representative needs to step up and become a leader. He should lead by getting castrated himself. Now, that would be a sign of a true leader, wouldn’t it?

  8. This is the BS these idiot D’Rat politicians dream up. We need to get rid of these people. They have no business being involved in controlling a dull pencil, let alone making laws that affect entire states and/or the country. It’s no wonder the Country is being destroyed by these buffoons.

    1. No, it can be reversed, castration is permanent, and well suited for the Demonrats in office.

  10. See? Democrats just keep PROVING what dictatorial fascists they are. This is simply an act of REVENGE for the loss of Roe v. Wade, which should NEVER have been a SCOTUS decision. It is a states rights issue. Abortion is NOT mentioned in the US Constitution, and is NOT a Constitutional “right”. But Leftists want their agenda FORCED down Americans throats… and whenever possible, via the US Constitution. That’s why they always put leftist activist judges on the bench, so as to “interpret” the Constitution to their way of thinking, and not to its original intent. All about Democrats getting and maintaining POWER!

  11. Quote: “‘Don’t tread on me but I’ll tread on thee’ is what I’m hearing from a lot of angry males who want government to control female reproductive rights but not theirs,” he wrote.” No one is trying to control female reproductive rights, simply trying to prevent the murder of babies. By the way, “reproductive” from the word “reproduce”. Reproduce is: VERB

    1. produce again:

    Abortion stops reproductive rights.

  12. A counter proposition: any woman can get an abortion. And since she clearly doesn’t want kids but wants to f*** and be irresponsible, she can also be sterilized.

    Problem solved… except for the little person who was murdered.

  13. Kind of drastic, but it did get your attention. I’m GUESSING that is his REASONING and is not REALLY so stupid as to think this is LEGAL! Just make the SPERMER FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE for the baby – that will greatly curtail unwanted pregnancies and condom sales will explode!

  14. Ah, there you go! Blame the boys when (young)women run around with scanty clothes, barely covering their a****, b****, and c*******, many having no idea how to sit and walk properly, being allowed to share bathrooms and all the sexting crap. They can also have the responsibilities of protecting themselves with behavior, as well as all the birth control availabel out there. It’s so ironically comical to me that with all the “sex education” that is given, all the gov’t info and stuff, we have the dumbest, laziest group of teen/20 somethings out there that don’t aren’t protecting themselves or having some sembalance of self-control

    1. You know, back over 100 years ago, women were actually treated with MORE respect in many ways, esp. culturally, by the men of the time. They weren’t treated simply like meat, as in the rap songs of today. Even though radical feminists call it “sexist”, men opened doors for women, refrained from using foul language when in their presence, wrote beautiful songs and poems of love and adoration for women, etc. Now look what we’ve got…equal pay for women, and zero cultural “adoration”. Thanks to the men-hating feminists.

  15. Boys don’t need vasectomies the Democrat party does. Idiots like this don’t need to procreate.

  16. Dolmens is a crackpot. His constituents need to show him the unemployment line.

    1. I think that’s a requirement for a Democrat to run for office — to be a crackpot!! There seem to be so many of those in our government today!! 🙄👎

  17. Do you Americans not see what is happening here .
    Now young men to have vasectomies.
    This is what the democrats want ,total control , suppression,
    It’s called Communist submission. Strong armed , oppression ,even death .
    Fkjbiden is a puppet controlled by the puppeteer, Obama ass .
    He always said he’d like to have a third term .
    His objective was America to be a third world country .
    Belief is , he’s the puppeteer.
    I’m sure the Patriots, veterans ,as rumoured ,are in the hills trained and waiting .

  18. There is something wrong with these democrats. FJB and the Country Destroying democrats.

  19. This democrat clown Oklahoma State Representative Mickey Dollens fits right in with the jacka**es that claim men can become pregnant and bear children. I think the democrats have really gone off the deep end. They have lost all perspective, common sense and rational thought!!

  20. I’ve read this several times recently. There’s this thing called birth control. It’s a little pill a woman takes to stop unwanted pregnancy and regulates their monthly period. They also have the option of having their tubes tied. Or…..men can use a condom or opt for a vasectomy. To force a vasectomy on a child is just criminal.

  21. Rep. Dollens need to begin with getting himself a full castration. Then he can submit his bill for consideration.

  24. How dare he? Doesn’t he realise that all males may not be able to have vasectomies – some may need to have his tubes tied! (S)

  27. Oklahoma, people in your state voted for and elected this ignorant moron. Chances are your people will vote for him again. Know many people in Oklahoma, friends, family and not a single one of them are this stupid, now yea a couple have some way out views, but nothing like this. Is it the water?

  29. Before an abortion can occur two people decided to knowingly have unprotected sex! (Not counting rape) Either way the only one who suffers is the only one without a voice! Birth Control usually falls on the woman since she is the “ONLY” one who can get pregnant regardless of what BS Democrats are pushing in the land of the crazies!
    How about people start taking some damn responsibility to get the Government out of your womb and sex life and think before you consummate!
    There’s no damn reason America should be performing or fighting over murdering 1 million defenseless little lives every year in the 21st century! Men and Women THINK before you hump!

  30. Just when I thought No One could be as Phucked up as biden, another one pops up. Incredible…

    1. Just another typical Democrat wanting to control people to an excessive extreme. Total wack job.

  31. Give them their abortion and tie their tubes. When they want to “plan parenthood” and can afford reversal surgery, go right ahead. There….we CAN compromise after all.

  32. Utter nonsense! Was there a contest started where you make the most idiotic comment possible to get on a news feed

    1. So did Margaret Sanger founder of Planned Parenthood she was a big supporter of the KKK

  37. Just so long as he goes first. Then gives an accounting of how many abortions he’s paid for. Then give us a description of what he thinks the word “abortion” means. All of a sudden all these liberals are “fighting” for women again, the swim competitions must be done for the year.

  38. Only if all democrats agree to be fully lobotomized until they think like responsible adults, speak like responsible adults, and act like responsible adults. It would mean giving up their childish behavior, and they’d have to stop doing the satan’s bidding, but maybe then they’d finally stop creating childish problems for everyone and start solving problems like responsible adults.

    Fair enough, democrats?

    1. How about electro-shock therapy instead of lobotomy? Lobotomy is so permanent. At least there is some potential for electro-shock improving the mind.

  39. May be this 🐎ass Democrat might tell AOC to have her hubby to be get one. Save the world from more idiots

  40. I have a much better idea. Implant BC in all teen girls, to be extracted when they prove they have the financial means to support a child.

    Too harsh? Sorry. I suppose we could go with chastity belts instead.

    2. But so many abortions are not because of financial issues but the emotional issue of not facing the responsibility of caring for or about any life they might bring into this world.

  41. I wonder how many people read the entire article before they posted a comment. Since men have been saying women need to control their bodies to prevent having so many kids being supported by welfare, how about the same for the men who impregnate a woman, and then leave her with the kid. So, yes, he’s a Democrat, but I believe his point is valid. “If you’re going to demand that government control women’s bodies with mandatory tubal ligation, guys, then be prepared to have YOUR tubes tied, too.

    1. If a woman can kill her child because it might interfere with her future, then a man can abandon his child for the same reason.

    2. But this idea is assuming that if a guy gets a girl pregnant, he would always want the abortion. Many guys are more honorable than that.

    3. You can thank the Democrats for that too. It was the Democrats who made it more profitable for the woman if there is no man in the house. Since the 1970’s the welfare case workers have been advising women that they will get more welfare benefits if the father is not living in the house.

  42. This guy’s former wife divorced him when she learned that this okie likes getting a pokey in his rectokie. He’s just another gay lib whore shilling for votes.

  43. A lesson on how to turn an entire state of men against you. A lot of democrat men will be voting Republican this year, maybe for the first time.

  44. So would Dollens agree that all girls in Oklahoma should be sterilized until they reach “financial and emotional stability?”

  45. Of course he’s not a Monkee (or monkey). Primates have much better common sense than Democrats.

    1. Actually, and I don’t throw this term around carelessly like idiot liberals do, involuntary sterilization is 100% pure NAZI!. Some patriot needs to send this liberal on-the-down-low punk to the rumpwrangling ranch in hell.

  47. Conspicuously absent from Rep. Dollens’ diatribe was the part about sewing little girls vaginas shut until they can understand that abortion is wrong and can prove that they can care for a baby.

  50. Misandry. I suggest tubal ligation until women are financially and emotionally responsible.

  51. I didn’t realize that one could guarantee results from a vasectomy reversal! Has anyone thought about trying to make it cool to keep one’s pants zipped, instead of the opposite?

    1. There is a much simpler and easier solutions. Women can keep their legs closed and their panties on. That way they can never get pregnant.

      Or be held financially responsible, for every child born out of wedlock.

      2. Any person receiving any form of support from any government agency should have the number of children “chiseled in stone” on their records. Supports are frozen at the amounts provided for applicants at time of first application. Have another child and the choice becomes either live on that original amount or give a child up for adoption. Any applicant who moves must provide bonafides that that they have no more children than they received support for where they moved from, under penalty of perjury, and repayment, in full, of all benefits provided in the new “home”.

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles