(Video: Fox News)
As the investigation into the origins of Russia-gate malfeasance methodically continues, former Trump administration official and attorney Kash Patel claims that “all roads lead to Andy McCabe…and the ‘lovebirds’…concocting an ‘insurance plan’ in August of 2015, and I think [Special Counsel] John Durham knows what that insurance plan is.”
The trio “led the biggest criminal conspiracy in U.S. history” in an attempt to take down Donald Trump, Patel declared in the video clip embedded above, and Trump’s rival Hillary Clinton participated in the “biggest disinformation campaign in U.S. history.”
In the meantime, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager Robby Mook reportedly has testified in court that his boss agreed to leak unfounded Trump-Russia information about Moscow-based Alfa-Bank to the media.
Hillary Clinton “knew it, authorized it, and they leaked that false information to the media to try to gin up attention against Donald Trump,” Patel said.
Andrew McCabe is the ex-deputy director of the FBI who was fired by the Trump administration after then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions concluded that he allegedly authorized the leaking of information on the Hillary Clinton email server case to the media and then lied about it.
The Biden administration subsequently restored his pension as part of a lawsuit settlement.
Robby Mook throws Clinton allies under the bus, testifies Hillary ‘agreed’ to leak Trump-Russia allegation to media https://t.co/OLkAHjad0T
— Jack Furnari (@JackBPR) May 20, 2022
Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, who interviewed Patel on the latest developments in Durham’s byzantine probe on “Sunday Morning Futures,” showed text messages from the so-called lovebirds, i.e., ex FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, in which the latter reassures the former that an insurance policy existed to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president in 2016.
“I remind the audience that’s in August of 2016 when they were digesting the Steele dossier, when they were running with the Alfa-Bank server nonsense, and when they were getting ready to go to the FISA court,” Patel said. “This trio, who led the biggest criminal conspiracy in U.S. history, I believe is in the crosshairs of John Durham, and that’s what’s coming next…he has their own words, putting them on blast in the FBI’s corruption…”
Patel added that he expects the trial of Clinton campaign lawyer Michal Sussmann, a former partner at the Perkins Coie law firm, to wrap up this week.
He even suggested that Page and Strzok could be cooperating in the Sussmann case, which could explain why Durham did not raise the issue of a conflict of interest in that the wife of the presiding judge in the Sussmann case is reportedly representing Page.
As alluded to above, Sussmann is charged with making a false statement to the FBI in relation to “‘a covert communications channel’ between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin,” Fox News reported. Sussmann told the agency that he wasn’t representing a client at the time.
Trump on Hillary’s alleged role in Russia smear: ‘For 3 years I had to fight those crooked people off’ https://t.co/makZKz8FDp
— Jack Furnari (@JackBPR) May 22, 2022
“Durham’s team alleges that Sussmann was, in fact, doing work for two clients: the Hillary Clinton campaign and a technology executive, Rodney Joffe. Following the meeting with Baker, Durham claims Sussmann billed the Hillary Clinton campaign for his work. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty to the charge,” Fox News added.
“Not only was the Steele dossier line of effort totally fraudulent, but so was the Alfa-Bank server effort, and Hillary Clinton knew about it, and she authorized it, and spent tens of millions of dollars pushing it to the FBI, the DOJ, and the media, and corrupting the world, and putting out the biggest disinformation campaign in U.S. history,” Patel asserted.
According to Bartiromo, Hillary Clinton allegedly paid up to $100 million to Perkins Coie.
“Hillary Clinton already admitted to violating the [Federal Election Commission] for spending those millions of dollars on opposition research instead of politics. And, yes, our investigation in Russia-gate showed she spent north of $50 million to $100 million pumping money into Perkins Coie so they could have a cutout, just like the FBI had a cutout…they could basically get a warrant and then leak to the media to have circular logic approve their fraudulent investigation,” Patel insisted.
He added that more indictments from the Durham investigation are on the way.
Bartiromo began the discussion by pointing out that an FBI cyber analyst testified at the Sussmann trial that there was insufficient data to conclude that the Trump organization was secretly communicating with Russia. “So the FBI knew in September 2016, and yet how many [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] warrants did they get to spy on the Trump campaign?” she asked rhetorically.
Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
[email protected]
Robert Jonathan is a staff writer for BizPac Review. He is a longtime writer/editor for news aggregation websites and has also developed content in the legal and financial publishing sectors as well as for online education. He earned a Juris Doctorate from the University of Connecticut School of Law, “a law school the basketball teams can be proud of.”
- ‘Petty heffa’: The View’s Ana Navarro skewered for cracking on Marjorie Taylor Greene’s appearance - December 4, 2022
- Women’s college volleyball game features incredible rally complete with diving, table-crashing safe - December 4, 2022
- Wild brawl breaks out at Fitness Connection gym, takes deciding turn when woman enters picture - December 4, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
