‘Voices of rage’: Angry pro-abortion protesters march on homes of Justices John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE


Dozens of loud, angry pro-abortion extremists marched to the D.C. homes of Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts on Saturday in what critics say was a blatant attempt to intimidate the justices into submission.

Yet Saturday’s march marked only the beginning of what some suspect will be a lengthy spring of loud demonstrations and possibly worse outside the justices homes, all of it tacitly endorsed by an administration that appears to care more about political advantage than decency and the law.

Photos and videos from Saturday’s march showed some of the extremists holding up signs that read “don’t tread on my choice” and “my body my choice,” messages that critics note are in direct contradiction to what the left had preached in regard to the COVID vaccine.

Other extremists held up signs that read “an abortion saved my family” and “abortion is healthcare, healthcare is a right.”

The extremists could likewise be heard chanting “keep abortion safe and legal,” “‘pro-life is a lie, you don’t care if people die,” “we will not go back” and “no uterus, no opinion.”

According to reports, the extremists first gathered in Chevy Chase, a neighborhood in northwest D.C., after which they marched to Kavanaugh’s home, then to Roberts’ home and then finally back to Kavanaugh’s home.

In addition to holding up signs and chanting slogans, the extremists also used chalk to draw coat hangers on the pavement in front of the home.

See more footage from the protests below:

In fairness to the extremists, they abstained from acting out violently, and most of them dispersed when ordered to by the authorities, although some did stay and argue.

But as noted earlier, Saturday’s protest appears to just be the beginning, and in fact another set of protests outside the Supreme Court justices’ homes — including this time the homes of Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — is scheduled for May 11th.

As previously reported, last week the radical far-left group Ruth Sent Us published the home addresses of all six justices and began signing up attendees to protest outside the homes.

“ANNOUNCING: Walk-by Wednesday, May 11, 2022! At the homes of the six extremist justices, three in Virginia and three in Maryland. If you’d like to join or lead a peaceful protest, let us know,” the group’s website reads.

Included on the website is a Google MyMap in which the address of each justice is marked with a pin.

Moreover, according to legal scholar Jonathan Turley, several high-profile individuals, including at least one member of the establishment press, have warned that “we are just getting started” and called for the justices to be bullied even “harder.”

Turley describes these as the “voices of rage addiction” and notes that they’re being bolstered by an administration that’s turning a blind eye to what’s happening — both the leaking of a potential Supreme Court decision, and the aftermath.

“[T]he Biden administration and the Justice Department have condemned the court’s leaked draft [ed. note: the draft itself, not the actual act of leaking] — but not the threatened protests at justices’ homes, even though those arguably could be treated as a crime,” he wrote on Saturday for The Hill.

“Under 18 U.S.C. 1507, it is a federal crime to protest near a residence occupied by a judge or jury with the intent to influence their decisions in pending cases, and this case remains pending.”

But again, the administration doesn’t seem to care.

Nor does the press.

The Washington Post eagerly published a profile Saturday of Kavanaugh’s neighbor, a left-wing extremist herself who’s “rall[ying] for abortion rights” by organizing protests outside the justice’s home.

“Even if she and the Kavanaughs don’t know each other personally, she thinks it’s important for him to hear that people in his own neighborhood vehemently disagree with him,” the piece reads.

“She’s furious at the thought of a world without Roe — that a few mostly male justices are making that decision for millions of women, and that Kavanaugh, who has been accused of sexual assault, which he denied, could be one of them.”

Kavanaugh’s sexual assault accuser has been thoroughly discredited, but the Post conveniently neglected to mention this.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

22 thoughts on “‘Voices of rage’: Angry pro-abortion protesters march on homes of Justices John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh

  1. ‘Don’t look out the window, kids
    The street is loaded with fat, ugly…women (just guessing)’

  2. Title 18 Section 1508. US Code
    Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
    Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.

  3. You must be an overpriced abortion doctor. This site is a conversation about abortion, not some fool bragging about making money online.

  4. These liberals needs to keep their legs close, and suck on a banana because I’m tired of hearing their Bull-sh-t

  5. What the filthy liberals are trying to do to the SC and people like Elon Musk would have the exact opposite effect on me.

    Unfortunately, it does not have that same effect on most of our spineless Republican representatives…they always cave

  6. Well…. If it’s FKN crime to harass Judges, arrest the dumb MUTHHA FKRS.

    And anyone who gets pregnant theses days with all sorts of pills and devices (given out by PPH) available to them and who doesn’t want to get pregnant is a lazt ass idiot.

  7. over 1 1/2 years later, J6 American Trump supporters are still stick in DC Gitmo prison.

  8. Let’s face it, it is liberals and serial baby mommas that use abortion as post birth control. As a Republican, I say let them kill their spawn.. we don’t need any more Democrats and fatherless youth.

  9. For the party that is always screaming about losing our democracy, they sure don’t seem believe in it. This constant protesting, which always leads to them becoming violent, is deplorable.

  10. A lot of noise about nothing. Most states have their own abortion rules already and that won’t change. Only the rest of the states that don’t have laws will now make them. What’s the big friggin’ deal, other than a a WH allowing law breaking?

  11. Hmm… “don’t tread on us”….”my body, my choice”….yet when it comes to mask mandates….. “You better do as I tell you”, where is “my choice” then?…. total hypocrites, besides being murderers….nice group.

    1. That’s what elections are supposed to do, if they are run honestly…. Oh, I forgot, morals are not part of the liberal platform….

  12. Replace the jan6 prisoners with these protesters for the same amount of time or prove to the people of this country the corruption inherent in our judicial system.

  13. In response to “No uterus, no opinion.” (why can’t they make it rhyme?) my immediate thought was “No cokc, no talk.” Yes, I answered misandry with misogyny.

  14. There are dozens of Jan. 6 protesters still locked up unconstitutionally in a D.C. gulag without due process or bail for over a year and a half for essentially trumped up trespassing charges. Yet this protestors are breaking federal law. Why aren’t they locked up?? Just asking for a friend……

  15. The issue is to return Abortion to the states. Not make it illegal. These people are mentally incompetent and it starts with some top representatives in our Government. Just more proof we need an abortion in Congress, Senate and the DOJ.

  16. Round them up. Lock them up. Min fine $10,000 and no release till it is paid. 2nd offense $75,000 and 30 days.

  17. It’s a federal crime to intimidate judges at their homes. Why aren’t they being arrested?

    1. The D.C. police will say that they cannot enforce federal law. Yet they do respond to bank robberies, as an example.

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles