Lib threatening to boycott ‘doing the dirty’ with men who want to end abortion gets unexpected support

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

Withholding intimacy is a means for women to punish their husbands or boyfriends who vote for the Republican Party in the upcoming midterm elections, a Twitter user who has about 131,000 followers is implying.

In proposing what amounts to a sex strike, the self-described political branding strategist claims that some GOP lawmakers want to eliminate legal birth control in addition to their opposition to abortion.

“Men, if you think you don’t get enough sex now, go ahead & vote for Republicans who plan to takeaway legal birth control & end all abortion. See how that works out for you,” Rachel Bitecofer, who claims her Twitter account “kills fascism,” wrote on the social media platform.

In a postscript, she added, “I know I’m not alone in the idea that of I have to choose between doing the dirty with you- or my career, health, and sanity, you’re losing.”

Bitecofer is receiving a lot of Twitter applause for these sentiments. However, outside of the conformist liberal Twitter bubble as well as in the corporate media, Americans are often conflicted about the sensitive abortion issue in the context of the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision and several related cases that followed.

A key abortion-related case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, is on the high court’s docket with a decision expected this summer about the constitutionality of a limit on a pregnancy termination after 15 weeks.

Given the tendency of the Roberts Court to often issue narrow decisions, the result may not be as sweeping as either the pro-choice left or the pro-life right expects, but time will tell.

A number of red states, however, such as Mississippi (which prompted the Dobbs case), Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming have enacted similar abortion restrictions within their borders and could find that a Dobbs ruling might impact their legislation.

In November 2021, influential law professor and pundit Jonathan Turley, a self-described liberal, wrote that “Today, the country remains deeply divided. Polls show strong support for Roe in principle but also support for limiting it.”

In an interesting historical footnote, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, even as she is celebrated for championing women’s rights, questioned to some degree the wide-ranging scope of Roe that overrode all state laws in effect at that time rather than an incremental approach to the controversy.

“A less encompassing Roe, one that merely struck down the extreme Texas law and went no further on that day…might have served to reduce rather than to fuel controversy,” Ginsburg said in a December 1992 lecture at New York University.

“Indeed, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a critic of Roe, seeing it as too sweeping in supplanting state laws. She later blamed the case for reversing the trend toward more pro-choice states,” Turley recalled.

There appear to be no legislative efforts pending to interfere with the ability to obtain birth control.

Apart from the pro-abortion advocates as alluded to above, others are getting busy on the social media platform in disagreeing with the enforced abstinence proposal (*warning for language):

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Robert Jonathan

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

32 thoughts on “Lib threatening to boycott ‘doing the dirty’ with men who want to end abortion gets unexpected support

  1. See – this woman has only HAD SEX – she obviously has never MADE LOVE with someone who is SPECIAL and who LOVES HER! THAT is so sad and probably why she has such a sour outlook on liFe!

  2. Dad seemed so excited about the possibility of overturning Roe vs. Wade at long last, with ACB and the other justices elected under Trump. Me, not so much, and not because I support abortion; I can’t see this predicted victory as permanent. I needn’t go into all my reasons here, it’s enough to point out that the people fearing the loss of their precious contraceptives, and the ones who had no qualms pointing out nobody will wind up in a “Catholic-sex only dictatorship” when abortion becomes a state-determined issue again are the ones who got the lion’s share of my attention.

    The crazies who don’t want to lose their abortions, abortifacients, condoms and pills are a hostile witness to a damning truth Pope Paul VI should’ve discussed in Humanae Vitae: that abortion and contraceptives are quite hard to separate in practice, perhaps it’s impossible, the former becoming a backup for the latter. Very unfortunate, then, that nobody opposed to abortion wants to talk about how Frank Susman made this connection in Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services, or how many kinds of “birth control” are abortifacients rather than true contraceptives. Equally problematic is the silence on statistics showing the correlation between them.

    Even if SCOTUS rules to put the abortion issue back into state hands, or goes so far as to make them illegal nation-wide, those victories will be built on an inconsistency, and finally tumble down when the more consistent among us go in the wrong direction.

  3. Hey, Lady, how about trying the old aspirin therapy. Or maybe abstaining from having sex and you won’t have to worry about killing an innocent baby.

  4. Not being allowed to have sex with that woman would be the biggest blessing ever. Maybe she might get a more feared response if she threatend to have sex. Ugh.

  5. I think I speak for all men when I say “PHEW.” Trust me, I don’t think there are many if ANY guys lining up to “do the dirty” with you.

  6. Here’s a novel idea–don’t marry a man who is Republican if you feel so strongly about his vote. You could actually TALK with him, as you should in approaching a committed relationship, and learn how he feels BEFORE you marry him. Otherwise, live alone and do it with the crazy guys who don’t care a whit about you and won’t see you again. Actually, just don’t do it at all. Spare the innocent lives.

  7. Why is it that those who make this threat are people you wouldn’t want to f**k in the first place?

  8. Well now, if there is a sex stoppage, then the abortion issue resolves itself. Kinda follows the old folks’ saying of “keep your legs crossed and feet on the floor.”

  9. Here we have a perfect example of “education by social media.” This du-may believes so strongly in rumors she’s heard from her “friends” that no amount of in her face plain and simple facts will change her alleged mind.

  10. It is always amusing to me that the “women” who complain the loudest and start talking about “sex strikes” are overwhelmingly the homely, unkempt, dog-face chicks out there – check the twitter replies above!

  11. “Soooo…abortion is birth control? You know there are like 10 or so other ways to prevent pregnancy.” Yeah, like cross your legs!

  12. My 75 year old aunt texted me last night to tell me she and my uncle tested positive for Covid. I drove to their house at 12:30 AM and dropped off Ivermectin pills, HCQ, zinc, and Quercetin. She told me today her fever came down and that I may have saved her life. Uncle is feeling great. This is considered a negative outcome by the cabal. They would prefer my family dead. Their evil is no longer a theory and very much a reality. You can get your ivm by visiting ivmcures.com

  13. Typical lying, crazed, progressive liberal. Create a straw man argument so she can address it by being outraged!

    There no legislative efforts pending to interfere with the ability to obtain birth control.

  14. The problem for people who support SOME abortions is not Roe. The real issue is Doe.

    That is the companion case that allows abortion on demand for virtually ANY reason right up to the moment before delivery. The SCOTUS supplied a definition of “health of the mother” that encompasses pretty much any excuse you can dream up.

  15. Perhaps the dumbest idea of all times. She probably considers herself a feminist and this is the most sexist thing I have seen in a long time. Paints women as shrews who don’t enjoy. initiate or even want to engage in sex with men. I’m glad I don’t know anyone like her. She must be a joy to be around

  16. I applaud Rachel Bitecofer for her stance championing abstention. Think of the abortions which won’t occur if people like Bitecofer don’t have sex anymore. Think of the millions of dollars that will be kept out of the hands of Big Abortion, groups like Planned Parenthood (Murder, Inc.). Sadly, I doubt anyone is currently having sex with Bitecofer anyway!

  17. She can most likely keep that promise, because she’s probably gay, or so screwed up in the head men stay clear of her, anyway.

  18. Her threat would be much more impactful if she looked like Olivia Wilde or Jessica Alba. But I looked her up. On the physical appearance side she’s more on the level of rosie o’donnell (no stranger to carbs and calories). I think she’s just making a bold political statement to bring attention to herself and in truth would not turn down any man who finds her attractive.

  19. Well I’m wearing my prolife t-shirt next time I go to the bar,,,if she will promise NOT to have sex with me,,,,FJB,,,,,,
    sympl1

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles