Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
President Joe Biden faces accusations that he killed a family of 10 Afghans, including seven children, all so he could save face and not look weak following the preventable bombing near the airport in Kabul that left 13 U.S. service members dead.
The accusations stem from a bombshell report published by The New York Times on Friday laying out detailed evidence that the targets of the Aug. 29th drone strike in Kabul weren’t ISIS terrorists as claimed by the Biden administration.
The evidence strongly suggests the Biden administration mistook Zemari Ahmadi, a “longtime worker for a U.S. aid group,” as a terrorist when they spotted him “and a colleague loading canisters of water into his trunk to bring home to his family.”
We see that car repeatedly in security camera footage from the office where Ahmadi worked. We verified the footage and accounted for the wrong camera settings by visiting the office and matching a specific scene with a satellite image from the day of the strike. @Maxar pic.twitter.com/fF22z8MKCI
— Christoph Koettl (@ckoettl) September 10, 2021
The footage matches what his co-workers told us: that it was a regular day for Ahmadi, incl. regular trips to and from the office. Crucial: We see him fill up several canisters of water to put into the trunk of his car before heading home. pic.twitter.com/zNACfrGohX
— Christoph Koettl (@ckoettl) September 10, 2021
“Military officials said they did not know the identity of the car’s driver when the drone fired, but deemed him suspicious because of how they interpreted his activities that day, saying that he possibly visited an ISIS safe house and, at one point, loaded what they thought could be explosives into the car,” the Times reported.
Recall that following the drone strike, the administration declared that it’d thwarted a group of ISIS suicide bombers from driving a vehicle full of bombs to the Hamid Karzai International Airport where evacuation flights were in progress.
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command released a statement acknowledging “reports of civilian casualties” but alleged without evidence that the alleged bombs in the vehicle they’d targeted produced “substantial and powerful subsequent explosions.”
Statement from U.S. Central Command
“We know that there were substantial and powerful subsequent explosions resulting from the destruction of the vehicle, indicating a large amount of explosive material inside that may have caused additional casualties.”https://t.co/PgPaWBcswe pic.twitter.com/BAKt5hZo79
— Travis Akers (@travisakers) August 30, 2021
But according to the Times, the Biden administration’s claims now appear to be either blatant lies or gross errors in judgments.
“[A]n examination of the scene of the strike, conducted by the Times visual investigations team and a Times reporter the morning afterward, and followed up with a second visit four days later, found no evidence of a second, more powerful explosion,” the Times confirmed in its report Friday.
“Experts who examined photos and videos pointed out that, although there was clear evidence of a missile strike and subsequent vehicle fire, there were no collapsed or blown-out walls, no destroyed vegetation, and only one dent in the entrance gate, indicating a single shock wave,” the report continued.
Weapons experts who reviewed photos and videos from the scene could not find evidence of the multiple, large-scale explosions that the Pentagon described. https://t.co/iziVUunLFe pic.twitter.com/4H4QpU8DNs
— Christoph Koettl (@ckoettl) September 10, 2021
The Times also obtained witness testimony that contradicts assertions from U.S. officials that they had “reasonable certainty” at the time of the strike that no women, children, or other innocent noncombatants would be killed from it.
“[A]ccording to his relatives, as Mr. Ahmadi pulled into his courtyard, several of his children and his brothers’ children came out, excited to see him, and sat in the car as he backed it inside,” the Times’ shocking report reads.
“Mr. Ahmadi’s brother Romal was sitting on the ground floor with his wife when he heard the sound of the gate opening, and Mr. Ahmadi’s car entering. His adult cousin Naser had gone to fetch water for his ablutions, and greeted him,” the report adds.
That’s when the drone strike hit, killing Ahmadi, three of his children, three of his brother’s children, two 3-year-old girls, and one of his cousins.
Pentagon investigating Biden’s drone strike against ISIS-K that reportedly killed children https://t.co/dINin12mMp pic.twitter.com/0ekiv6vvhm
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) August 30, 2021
Despite this trove of evidence, the Biden administration continues to maintain that it’d been in the right to execute a drone strike against Ahmadi.
“Two well-placed U.S. military sources [say] that the U.S. Central Command remains confident that the strike was based on accurate intelligence that showed the person in the car had bad intent, and that an investigation is underway into how many civilians were killed,” Fox News confirmed late Friday.
However, Ahmadi’s family members insisted to the Times that the idea he was a terrorist is beyond absurd.
They “questioned why Mr. Ahmadi would have a motivation to attack Americans when he had already applied for refugee resettlement in the United States,” according to the Times.
“His adult cousin Naser, a former U.S. military contractor, had also applied for resettlement. He had planned to marry his fiancée, Samia, last Friday so that she could be included in his immigration case,” as reported by the Times.
“All of them were innocent. You say he was ISIS, but he worked for the Americans,” Ahmadi’s other brother, Emal, said to the outlet.
This stunning report from the Times triggered large-scale outrage, with high-profile critics, including Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald accusing the president of having authorized the drone strike for a positive headline.
Look:
An entire family in Afghanistan was extinguished to prevent Joe Biden from having to endure a news cycle accusing him of weakness in the face of the attack at Kabul Airport, accompanied by lies from his Pentagon/CIA and his media about who was killed.https://t.co/1qNbQZWrYQ
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) September 10, 2021
Biden and Milley claimed this was an ISIS attack in the making
They were filling water bottles
And their entire family was murdered so Joe Biden could get a headline pic.twitter.com/kSXn0cbW3d
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 10, 2021
Criticism was also aimed at the president’s top officials, from “sociopath” Pentagon press secretary John Kirby to “cold-blooded and pathological liar” Gen. Mark Milley.
Look:
It’s nice that Gen. Mark Milley has been studying the sacred texts regarding White Rage but it’s unfortunate that he’s such a cold-blooded and pathological liar and that there’s zero chance he will ever face any accountability for it: https://t.co/w5pbFtCJs5
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) September 10, 2021
Biden’s @PentagonPresSec John Kirby — they just like lie sociopaths, not even blinking: pic.twitter.com/tGNCskSKQA
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) September 10, 2021
A few defenders of Biden and his administration pushed back on the mounting criticism by either claiming the Times had been duped by Taliban propaganda or blaming former President Donald Trump, who hasn’t been in office for eight months.
Case in point:
Drone warfare has simultaneously been a great and terrible addition to our modern arsenal. People acting like Biden admin killed civilians on purpose should stfu and/or learn some history of the program. Awful it happened… perhaps the largest downside of their use.
— Ian Livingston (@islivingston) September 11, 2021
Folks on the right acting like we have been virtuous in war until recently are either liars, not that smart or totally uninformed. US has drastically lowered civilian casualties in war over time. Trump oversaw a huge increase via airstrikes. I don’t see him being blamed for that.
— Ian Livingston (@islivingston) September 11, 2021
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jen Psaki panics, asks where’s the Republican ‘bed-wetting’ over Trump being likely nominee - October 1, 2023
- Shocking number of French back limiting air travel, but climate zealots set a CRAZY limit - October 1, 2023
- Former ABC journalist gets just 6 years for child porn – videos included infant being raped - October 1, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.