Legal scholar and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley reacted to the unsealed indictment of former President Donald Trump on Fox News Friday.
Among the 37-counts contained in the 49-page indictment, Turley said the biggest issues were the obstruction and false statements charges.
“They are going to have to get these witnesses to show that it is not as cut and dry as this indictment says,” he said. “That’s going to take a lot of work.”
Turley noted that it “seems unlikely that they can get this to trial before the election” given the “broad array of witnesses.”
“That could make the election a type of referendum on how people feel about this case,” he said. “You may have a second jury composed of tens of millions of Americans essentially voting on this. Because if he is elected, he could pardon himself.”
Trump is a “counter-puncher” who tends to “shove back when shoved,” Turley said, which is “not necessarily the best inclination when you’re dealing with classified documents.”
“Once again, we have a narrative here that was written by people who want to send the former president away for the rest of his life, so we have to read this indictment with that in mind,” he said. “But parts of this indictment sort of have a certain pattern.”
In addition to 31-counts alleging “the willful retention of national defense information,” the indictment includes counts against Trump for a “conspiracy to obstruct Justice,” “witholding a document or record,” “corruptly concealing a document or record,” “concealing a document in a federal investigation,” “a scheme to conceal,” and “false statements and representations.”
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Eyebrow raising’ details in Bob Menendez indictment complicate defense, legal experts say - September 25, 2023
- Federal appeals court to rehear case that could devastate Biden admin’s censorship regime - September 25, 2023
- Top state election officials say they will defer to the courts on removing Trump from 2024 ballot - September 25, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
