Latest

Father desperately tries to stop pediatrician wife from chemically castrating 9-yr-old son, Cali law is against him

January 6, 2023 | | Print Article

Jeff Younger, a father of a 9-year-old boy, is desperately trying to stop his ex-wife from chemically castrating their son in California.

As previously reported, California recently declared itself a sanctuary state for parents who want to perform sex reassignment surgery on their children.

After the declaration, Younger’s ex-wife moved to California with their son, prompting fear from him over what might come next.

The problem, he explained on Fox News’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight” this Thursday, is that his ex-wife zealously believes their boy is a girl.

And apparently, she’s convinced the boy of the same.

Indeed, during Younger’s appearance on Fox News, Carlson played a video of the boy telling Younger that he’s “a girl” and that his “mommy” was the one who’d told him that.

Watch from the :25 second mark below:

“You’re a boy, right?” Younger asks the boy in the clip.

“No. I’m a girl,” the boy replies.

“Who told you you’re a girl?” Younger then asks.

“Mommy,” the boy responds.

“Why did she tell you you’re a girl?” Younger presses.

“Because I love girls,” the boy replies.

Eponymous host Tucker Carlson was taken aback by the clip.

“That’s just the saddest thing. That’s a child,” he said.

“Well, Jeff Younger, the father of that boy, went to the Texas Supreme Court to try to protect his son. He wanted an order to prevent his ex-wife from having the boy sexually mutilated in the state of California. But the court rejected his petition in an eight to one vote, shocking Jeff,” he added, before inviting Younger onto the show for an interview.

Younger then proceeded to provide an overview of the whole case.

“My blood ran cold when I realized what she [the ex-wife] had planned for that boy. It escalated to eventually she registered [the boy] in school as a girl. I had to shut that down. So the Coppell School District began to secretly transition my son. I’d bring my son to school in boys’ clothes, and they’d give him a dress and make him use the girls’ restroom. And it even escalated further where she [the ex-wife] began to present him to the world as a girl,” he said.

“I lived under temporary orders from a court where I wasn’t even allowed to tell my son that he was a boy, where I had to present him to the world as a girl. And you know, his twin brother got completely confused by all this,” he added.

He continued by describing what happened in 2019, when a court “gave me 50/50 custody and joint conservator rights to check her ability to transition my son.”

The problem is the “corrupt Democrat establishment in Dallas County” then transferred the case to someone else — 301st District Court Judge Mary Brown — and she proceeded to reverse everything.

“She never implemented the trial with the jury verdict and has, through temporary order, stripped me of all my parental rights and eventually allowed my ex to move to California right before — just a few days before the sanctuary law in California went into effect,” Younger explained.

Responding to Younger’s story, Carlson then asked him whether “any adult in authority” has stepped up to help him. He replied with a resounding no.

“Absolutely no one in the state of Texas has stood up for me except for Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General. I went to the legislature on two sessions, and by some quantitative measures I generated more political power for a bill against transgender child abuse than for any bill in Texas history. Some offices were recording 300 lobbyists a day on my bills,” he said.

“We could not get that bill passed because the speaker of the House, Dade Phelan, blocked those bills from passage. So the legislature did nothing. The governor did not mobilize the agencies to protect Texas children from these abusive procedures, sterilization, and chemical castration. Did nothing. I could not get the executive branch to move,” he added.

Sadly, Younger faced the same from the courts.

“I thought I would get relief in the appellate courts in the judicial branch, and I go up to the Texas Supreme Court, and they determine absurdly that my wife is no more likely to transition my son in California under the sanctuary laws than she would in Texas,” he said.

“And absurdly, not even really reading Senate Bill 107, claims that we can enforce an injunction against her in California when a plain reading of the bill says that they will not enforce these adjunctions, they will not obey subpoenas, they will not obey extradition, and they will not return the child to me under any circumstances,” he added.

Republished with permission from American Wire News Service

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

$10
$15
$25
$50
Other
$
Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena
Latest posts by Vivek Saxena (see all)

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles