(Video: Fox News)
It’s now been nearly two weeks since the publication of a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that has led to speculation that Roe v. Wade will be overturned and despite an investigation, there are no details on the identity of the culprit, not that Democrats have much interest in finding the individual who inflicted grave damage on the court.
Politico’s bombshell on the unprecedented leak was a gift from the heavens for Democrats who were facing the prospect that their one-party dominance of the U.S. political system will be aborted after a mere two years but the document which was penned by conservative Justice Samuel Alito has energized their emotionally unstable activist base and provided them with an issue to run on in this year’s critical midterm elections.
Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich explained why Democrats are uninterested in finding the leaker, suggesting that it is just the continuation of the leftist party’s ongoing efforts to undermine the nation’s highest court.
Pavlich appeared on Saturday’s edition of “One Nation” where she was asked by host Brian Kilmeade, “Why isn’t there any more interest in finding out who leaked and do you have an idea of who it might be?”
She replied, “Well there’s been a lot of speculation about whether this was a liberal clerk, who was clerking for a more left leaning justice, there’s also been some accusations from Democrats that this was a conservative on the court leaking this because they want Roe versus Wade overturned.”
“We don’t know who it is,” she said. “We have heard calls from the likes of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell saying that the leaker should be prosecuted if they have broken any laws. The Department of Justice has not expressed much interest in looking at who the leaker is, and certainly they haven’t expressed much interest in going after people descending on the homes of conservative justices.”
Pavlich continued, “But if you look at the way that the evidence has piled up, Democrats have used this, including the White House, they’ve tried to ignore the leak, to push it aside, as Jen Psaki said when it first came out, to focus on the issue of Roe versus Wade.”
“And it follows a pattern of Democrats trying to undermine the court,” she added, “whether it’s with court-packing or going after Supreme Court nominees that happen to be appointed by a Republican, trying to get their nomination thrown out.”
“And, of course, you’ve had Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer standing on the steps of the court just last year during a hearing on a case about abortion threatening Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch on that very issue,” she pointed out, noting the top Senate Democrat’s incitement of the mob.
“I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price!”
— Sen. Chuck Schumer at a pro-abortion rally near SCOTUS in March 2020 as the court heard arguments about Louisiana’s anti-abortion lawpic.twitter.com/lguWx44UW3— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) May 8, 2022
“So it follows the left-leaning pattern, but we do not know who the leaker is,” Pavlich concluded.
One thing that the leaker has accomplished is to have severely damaged the SCOTUS as an institution, something that conservative Justice Clarence Thomas acknowledged during a speech at a conference in Dallas on Friday.
‘Gone forever’: Justice Thomas says Roe leak ‘fundamentally’ changed SCOTUS https://t.co/WgCFGiq5Jd
— American Wire News (@americanwire_) May 15, 2022
“When you lose that trust, especially in the institution that I’m in, it changes the institution fundamentally. You begin to look over your shoulder. It’s like kind of an infidelity that you can explain it, but you can’t undo it,” Thomas said.
Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
Chris Donaldson is an ordinary American who is concerned about rampant corruption as well as the ongoing attacks on our way of life by those who have contempt for our hard-earned freedoms. A Navy veteran, he has been a frequent contributor to conservative websites and resides in Florida.
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
9 thoughts on “Katie Pavlich explains why Dems have little interest in identifying Supreme Court leaker”
Comments are closed.
We all know that the leaker was the Wide Latina’s commie, Yale clerk.
It was Sotomayor and some patriot should administer street justice.
IT doesn’t HAVE to be destroyed or “gone Forever”! All you have to do is IDENTIFY and PROSECUTE the CRIMINAL! That’s it – put them in PRISON for a Few years and then FORBID them From ever working in a POLITICAL or Government OFFice! AND, since they would be a CONVICTED FELON, they don’t get to vote – LEGALLY that is!
An off topic request. Every body please take the time to down vote these asshole spammers “making $92/hour” or some such. Report them using the red flag icon in the top right when you hover over the post.
Seems harmless enough, but it is these assholes that ruin anything for a penny.
None of them escape my down vote and red flag click. We all need to band together somehow and start putting group pressure on BPR to at least give us the option to block spammers ourselves since they don’t delete very much of the spam comments themselves even thought they can. And NO ONE at BPR seems to give a damn that the effing f key causes nothing but effing problems for PC and Mac users. I never realized how often the letter f is used until I came here.
The leaker is either one of the three liberal justices, or RINO roberts, or one of their clerks, and it makes no sense to expose him or her and have to defend both the leak and the leaker. It’s a can of worms they really don’t need opened this close to the midterm election (ASSUMING the election won’t be canceled!).
If this was done with the KNOWLEDGE of a Justice then THAT “justice” should be IMPEACHED and REMOVED from the Court! THAT might be WHY the “non interest”!
Winner, winner – Chicken Dinner!
If the fed cancels the election then we cancel the feds. Period. They don’t obey the law so there’s no reason why we should. REVOLUTION NOW.