Celebs are ‘super-spreaders’ of coronavirus misinformation, study says

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE.


While it’s true the left-wing establishment media spread (and produce) a large swath of fake news, researchers from Queensland University of Technology’s Digital Media Research Centre say celebrities are the ultimate “super-spreaders” of garbage.

Led by Prof. Axel Bruns, a research team “looked into a range of COVID-19-related disinformation circulating online, and found that spikes in circulation nearly always correlated with celebrity or media endorsements,” according to the Brisbane Times.

“[O]nce you get major celebrities with literally millions of followers on Twitter or Facebook talking about this [or that fake news story], even just dismissively, obviously it reaches a much, much larger audience,” Bruns said during an online presentation on viral disinformation hosted by the Australia Institute last Thursday.

He added: “These are the super-spreaders. These are the people who are really making something go viral.”

Keep in mind this is coming from somebody who, as evidenced by some of the tweets below that he’s retweeted from his Twitter profile, is not a fan of U.S. President Donald Trump, a man who gets along neither with Hollywood nor the media.

The tweets above that Bruns retweeted both pertain to the incident involving CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins that occurred last Friday. And as seen above, they falsely paint Collins as a victim and the president as a bad guy.

One bit of fake news that Bruns’ team examined was the conspiracy theory that 5G cell phone towers are somehow linked to the spread of the coronavirus.

“The data they studied revealed a spike in shares of that content occurred after American actor Woody Harrelson endorsed the theory, and American rapper Wiz Khalifa spoke about it in a video posted to his Facebook page, which is followed by almost 40 million people,” the Times reported.

“Spikes also occurred when UK tabloid the Daily Express wrote an article about it, when a Nigerian pastor’s warning about the theory went viral, and when a UK boxer posted a similar video to a sports group with almost 26 million members.”

What’s bizarre is that one of Bruns’ team members, fellow researcher Dr. Timothy Graham, may have tried to portray these individuals and outlets as somehow pro-Trump.

“Social media has been a “‘payday’ for disinformers — many of them pro-Trump, Q’Anon posters — trying to sway people to their world view, says fellow researcher Dr Timothy Graham,” the Times reported.

Because of the way the Times wrote the story, it’s unclear whether the paper itself was accusing the “disinformers” of being pro-Trump or whether the accusation originated with Graham. Either way, the accusation seems to be demonstrably false.

Last year, Hollywood actor Woody Harrelson accused the president of boasting a “God complex.” And in a tweet posted before the 2016 election, rapper Wiz Khalifa urged his fans to vote, lest “this fool Trump” win.

Look:

These don’t appear to be the words of “pro-Trump” people …

“Now the public is genuinely confused, and genuinely divided. They’re pointing fingers at China… and at each other. This is payday for disinformers. This is the best thing that could happen to them and the worst thing that could happen for democracy,” the Times quoted Thomas as explicitly saying.

It’s not clear what his beef with people “pointing fingers at China” happens to be, given as the Communist Party of China is responsible for the coronavirus pandemic.

As for a solution to the epidemic of fake news circulating on social media, Bruns recommended starting with fact-checking. But the problem is that social media fact-checkers have themselves been known to produce and share fake news.

Moreover, on more than one occasion, the so-called fact-checkers have completely bungled their fact-check.

“Way back on Feb. 23, The Post ran an opinion piece by Steven Mosher saying that we couldn’t trust China’s story about the origins of COVID-19,” the New York post reported earlier this month.

“He argued that the virus might — might — have jumped to the human population thanks to errors at a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan, rather than via that city’s now-notorious ‘wet market.’ The piece was widely read online — until Facebook stepped in.”

The social media network’s fact-checkers decided the piece wasn’t factually accurate. Yet weeks later, it’s now been confirmed that actually, the piece was likely correct.

The most effective solution, Bruns added, would be to encourage people to learn how to perform research and think critically.

“You have these celebrities, politicians and others with very large audiences, and getting them to not share something or not talk about something that they have no idea about – that may be very difficult to do, but it is a really important point where further transmission … can be stopped,” he said.

Unfortunately, critical thinking skills are on a steady decline these days, particularly among clueless celebrities.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles