Feinstein, first Democrat to suggest she could acquit Trump, does head-spinning walkback


In a matter of hours, Sen. Dianne Feinstein seemed to abruptly flip from telling reporters that the American people should be the final arbiters in President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial to loudly proclaiming his guilt. The speedy about-face led some to speculate that perhaps the so-called “Deep State” had gotten to her.

Speaking with reporters Tuesday afternoon, shortly after the president’s legal team concluded their defense, the California senator made remarks that seemed to signal she wasn’t completely sure about convicting the president.

Nine months left to go [before the election], the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge. That was my view and it still is my view,” she said, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The Times interpreted her remarks as an indication that she was considering acquitting the president on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of justice:

The story seen above quickly went viral across social media:

About thirty minutes after the report’s publication, however, the senator dropped a tweet claiming the Times had misinterpreted her remarks.

“The LA Times misunderstood what I said today,” she wrote. “Before the trial I said I’d keep an open mind. Now that both sides made their cases, it’s clear the president’s actions were wrong. He withheld vital foreign assistance for personal political gain. That can’t be allowed to stand.”

A couple hours later, Savannah Behrmann of USA Today published a report providing a more detailed analysis of what Feinstein had actually said earlier that day.

“In a scrum with reporters in the Capitol subway after Trump’s Senate impeachment trial adjourned for the day, Feinstein said she had initially leaned in favor of acquittal, but after the six days of presentations in the trial, she was reconsidering,” Behrmann wrote.

“‘I was going to vote against it” Feinstein said. She then clarified that she meant impeachment. She said the trial testimony was ‘such a window that opens you to the thinking of the man in charge.’ When asked to clarify again whether she would have voted against impeachment before the trial, she said initially favored allowing the voters to decide Trump’s fate in November.”

“Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge. That was my view and it still is my view,” Feinstein then said, as reported by Behrmann.

While the senator claimed that her remarks about letting the American people be the ultimate arbiters of Trump’s fate were just a recap of how she’d initially felt about the matter going into the president’s impeachment trial, both the Times and Behrmann reported that she’d said she “still” maintains this viewpoint.

And so yes, judging by her remarks, it did seem there was a chance she might acquit the president. Yet for some inexplicable reason, she felt compelled to post the following tweet:

Her abrupt walk-back inspired conspiracy theories about Feinstein being visited by the “Deep State,” as well as rebukes from those annoyed by her inability to stick to her own words:

The good news for Republicans is that she’s not the only Democrat who’s been reported as considering his/her options.

“Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Doug Jones of Alabama are undecided on whether to vote to remove the president from office and agonizing over where to land,” Politico confirmed Tuesday.

Of course, there’s always the chance they too will flip-flop like Feinstein (or John Bolton) once the story goes viral.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles