Evie Fordham, DCNF
- The House Ethics Committee’s investigation into North Carolina Republican Rep. Mark Meadows stems from allegations against his former chief of staff.
- The committee’s investigation into Nevada Democratic Rep. Ruben Kihuen stems from three women’s accusations that he sexually harassed them between 2013 and 2017.
- The committee wrapped up months of investigations with sanctions on both congressmen Friday.
The House Ethics Committee sanctioned Republican North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows and Nevada Democratic Rep. Ruben Kihuen in two separate investigations Friday.
The committee started investigating Meadows’s office in 2016 after female staffers accused his former chief of staff Kenny West of sexual harassment. Meadows will have to reimburse the U.S. Treasury for roughly $40,000 of overpaid salary to West after Meadows demoted him in 2015.
The committee sanctioned Kihuen after learning in December 2017 of several women’s allegations that he sexually harassed them, reported Roll Call. Kihuen chose not to seek re-election in December 2017, reported The Las Vegas Review-Journal.
The ethics committee had a mixed review of Meadows’s handling of allegations against West.
“Representative Meadows could have and should have done more to ensure that his congressional office was free from discrimination or the perception of discrimination,” the committee stated in its report Friday. “While Representative Meadows did take some important immediate steps after learning of the allegations of sexual harassment by Mr. West, he did not do enough to address the allegations or to prevent potential further harassment or retaliation.”
Meadows issued the following statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation Friday:
Three years ago I asked the Committee on Ethics to review the matter surrounding the alleged conduct of my former chief of staff, Mr. West, and I’m thankful their review has now concluded. I appreciate the Committee’s acknowledgement of the immediate, appropriate, and good faith steps I did take after learning of my staff’s concerns—including immediately separating the chief from the accusers so they never had to interact with him personally during the independent investigation. Making sure my team feels safe and secure in our office is the highest priority for me and I’m truly sorry for any stress this situation caused them. I thank the Ethics Committee for their work in resolving this, and my office will remain committed to serving western North Carolinians every day to the best of our ability.
The committee’s report pointed out problems with separating West from the female staffers he was accused of harassing.
“The Committee is concerned that Representative Meadows’ ‘solution’ to the sexual harassment allegations, to cut off all contact between Mr. West and most of his female employees, caused another potential problem,” the report stated. “An environment where only male staff have access to the Chief of Staff risks unequal treatment of employees based solely on sex.”
Meadows is chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus. His fellow caucus member Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan lost out to California Republican Rep. Kevin McCarthy for house minority leader Wednesday.
Meadows’s membership in the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has placed him in the spotlight during the Department of Justice’s investigation into possible collusion between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.
Three women who interacted with Kihuen through their jobs accused Kihuen of unwanted kissing, grabbing and comments about underwear, according to Roll Call.
“Kihuen made persistent and unwanted advances towards women who were required to interact with him as part of their professional responsibilities,” the committee’s report said according to Roll Call.
The women who made allegations against Kihuen included a D.C. “firm employee,” a campaign staffer and a lobbyist, according to Roll Call.
Kihuen issued the following statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation Friday:
After much reflection and introspection, I recognize that regardless of the fact that I never intended to make anyone feel uncomfortable or disrespected, what matters is how my actions were perceived by the women who came forward. It saddens me greatly to think I made any woman feel that way due to my own immaturity and overconfidence. I extend my sincere apologies to each of these women. Though I do not agree with aspects of the Report, I am thankful the Committee afforded everyone an opportunity to be heard and appreciate the Committee’s acknowledgment that I fully cooperated with the investigation.
Send tips to [email protected].
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Online investors believe a banking titan might be on the verge of collapse, analysts disagree. Here’s why - October 7, 2022
- Zelenskyy calls for preemptive NATO strikes against Russia before Putin launches nukes - October 7, 2022
- Dem city’s police dept allegedly shoots multiple gun-toting intruders in back-to-back weeks - October 7, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.