Conservative firebrand Judge Jeanine Pirro dropped the hammer of justice on former Attorney General Loretta Lynch in a scathing diatribe Saturday, basically accusing her of purposefully planting an informant in President Donald Trump’s election campaign.
“Any ‘collector’ — their name for an informant working on a national campaign — must have a sign off by the Attorney General. Here that would be liar Loretta Lynch. Lynch, herself, would have to have approved an informant on that campaign,” the Fox News host said during Saturday evening’s broadcast of “Justice with Judge Jeanine.”
The judge’s accusations concerned reports that a top-secret CIA and FBI source spied on several of the president’s campaign advisers during the election two years ago.
What remains unknown is the identity of the source/informant, when he began spying on Trump’s campaign and whether he was directed by the FBI, the CIA or both. If he was directed by the FBI, that would mean Lynch knew about and even approved his actions.
“And if she didn’t then the FBI under James Comey was even more corrupt, going rogue in their attempt to destroy Donald Trump,” Pirro noted Saturday.
That too is certainly a possibility, especially given Comey’s sordid history.
What also remains unknown is what exactly prompted the FBI, the CIA or both to target Trump’s campaign with a spy.
Some, including the president, believe the spying campaign was launched in a bid to help failed Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton:
What’s clear as day is that, despite the left’s nonstop claims of corruption by the Trump administration, it was in reality the administration of former President Barack Hussein Obama that regularly partook in questionable behavior.
Lynch was no different. Only days before Comey publicly exonerated Clinton in July of 2016, she met privately with the then-presidential nominee’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, on the tarmac of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.
What did they talk about? Did they discuss the FBI’s plans to exonerate his wife? Or perhaps they discussed a plan to prevent Trump from becoming president? Maybe they even recognized methods of spying on Trump.
To this day nobody knows what they talked about.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘We have no protection’: Portland shop shutters due to ‘unrelenting’ crime, posts scorching note on door - November 27, 2022
- Top academics with WH ties call for return of mask mandates, claim masks have ‘psychological benefits’ - November 27, 2022
- Suspect hijacks San Francisco bus, goes on 1.5 mile rampage side-swiping cars - November 27, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.