You want collusion? Lookee over here.
— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) June 23, 2017
During the entire five months President Trump has been in office, the FBI and two congressional committees have been looking onto the possibility that collusion existed between his election campaign and the Kremlin.
Like the Ford Motor Company, the Senate Judiciary Committee has a better idea.
A bipartisan group of committee members is probing former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s interference on behalf of Trump’s rival — former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the FBI’s criminal investigation into her email scandal.
The group is specifically honing in on Lynch’s communications with Clinton campaign aide Amanda Renteria as well as any information as to what, if any, investigation the FBI conducted into their communications, according to ABC News, which reported:
The letters, sent Thursday, are signed by Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley, Ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein, as well as Sens. Lindsey Graham and Sheldon White House, the chair and ranker on the subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism.
The senators question Open Society Foundations’ Leonard Benardo and its General Counsel Gail Scovell, as well as Renteria and Lynch, about a May 24 story from the Washington Post that reported Lynch assured Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far. Lynch declined to comment at the time.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz reportedly wrote an email recounting the Lynch-Renteria communication while she was still chair=woman of the Democratic National Committee.
If Lynch didn’t know already, social media told her that she has some splaining to do.
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
What took so long?!
— Sandy (@s_j67) June 23, 2017
I predict that Dems, MSM (redundant) will respond with “racist”, “mysoginistic” and any other “ists” they can to defend her.
— Chris Clinkinbeard (@Clinkin53) June 23, 2017
About time! Also probe why DNC did not turn over servers after hacked as requested by DHS. It wasn’t Russia folks. Obama Lynch knew of it
— mas (@masegesta) June 23, 2017
— PatrioticCovfefe (@AnnAhmerican) June 23, 2017
— Adriana Cohen (@AdrianaCohen16) June 23, 2017
Earlier this week Judicial Watch’s request for Susan Rice’s unmasking material was denied, because the information requested was “removed to Obama Library.”
The question is, What library? Except on possibly an architect’s drafting table, it doesn’t exist.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.