Democratic leaders blasting President Donald Trump’s military strikes on Iran say the situation differs from the 2011 bombing campaign in Libya carried out under former President Barack Obama.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the Trump administration following strikes against Iran, arguing that the president failed to seek congressional authorization before launching military operations. Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin asked Jeffries why Democrats insist Trump must seek congressional approval for strikes against Iran, while some party leaders previously defended Obama’s decision to launch air operations in Libya without explicit authorization from Congress.
“Back in 2011, Nancy Pelosi said that then-President Obama didn’t need congressional approval to bomb Libya. Now House Democrats say President Trump needs that approval to bomb Iran. What’s the difference?” Melugin asked the minority leader.
WATCH:
NEW: I asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) about Nancy Pelosi saying in 2011 that President Obama didn’t need Congressional approval to bomb Libya, but Dems now say President Trump needs approval to bomb Iran?
Jeffries said Iran is “very different” & told me “I… pic.twitter.com/SkLr1R5wr1
— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) March 3, 2026
“Well, obviously, Libya and the circumstances connected to that were very different from the circumstances that we face in Iran right now. I mean, I don’t even understand the genesis or basis of that question. I suggest that you’re not asking in good faith. Libya went on for seven months, as I’ve indicated,” Jeffries responded. “First of all, I was not in Congress at the time. So we’re dealing with what we’re dealing with right now, which is a catastrophic, endless war, as Donald Trump has characterized it, without any justification that there was going to be a preeminent assault or attack on the United States of America, either in our homeland or as it relates to our interests in the Middle East.”
U.S. officials said Trump’s Operation Epic Fury aimed to eliminate “imminent threats” from the Iranian regime, including missile capabilities and potential nuclear weapons development. The Trump administration said the objective of the strikes was to defend the United States by neutralizing threats posed by Iran’s military infrastructure and leadership.
Melugin later contacted the office of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a statement regarding the issue. Pelosi’s office argued that the two conflicts cannot be compared.
NEW: I reached out to Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) office to ask about her position in 2011 that President Obama didn’t need Congressional approval to bomb Libya for 7 months, and how that squares with her position on Trump/Iran now?
Statement to @FoxNews 👇🏻 pic.twitter.com/5tMp3EUXf9
— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) March 3, 2026
“There is an absolute distinction between the limited military operations in Libya and the broad, escalating war with Iran initiated by President Trump. ‘Speaker Pelosi’s position has been consistent: when the prospect of expansive or prolonged hostilities exists, the Constitution and the War Powers Act are clear that Congress must authorize it,” the statement said. “Meanwhile, President Trump’s position has been entirely inconsistent: breaking his promise not to start new wars, oscillating in his rationale for this war, and shifting the goal posts of his objectives for the war.”
Pelosi’s claim that the Libya intervention was merely a “limited military operation” contrasts with reports that the U.S.-backed NATO campaign lasted roughly seven months and involved thousands of airstrike missions against Libyan forces after Obama ordered the strikes without seeking congressional authorization.
The intervention triggered a major debate in Washington over whether the administration had bypassed Congress under the War Powers Resolution, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. The NATO operation ultimately played a role in the collapse of the regime of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Trump admin reaches settlement with Carter Page over FISA spying - April 23, 2026
- Trump Navy secretary resigns effective immediately - April 23, 2026
- Virginia circuit court rules redistricting vote unconstitutional - April 22, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
