Dem AG rescinds letter demanding to know how Rumble is censoring content after legal pushback

Democratic Attorney General Letitia James of New York withdrew on Thursday her letter to Rumble that called on the company to censor violent content, according to a document posted by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).

James allegedly violated a court order by sending letters to Rumble, Meta, TikTok, Google, Reddit, and X — formerly Twitter — about how they plan to ensure that violent content does not proliferate on their platforms amid the Israel-Hamas War, according to FIRE. A FIRE attorney demanded that James take back all the letters by Oct. 20, but James only retracted the one to Rumble, according to the document.

“While we wholeheartedly disagree with your analysis and the contentions in your letter, in view of your statement that Rumble has ‘already provided its content-moderation policies’ to the Attorney General’s Office, and in the interest of avoiding any unnecessary dispute, this Office hereby withdraws the voluntary requests set forth in its October 12, 2023 letter to Rumble,” James’ office wrote.

FIRE asserted that a February federal district court decision to block a New York law censoring objectionable social media content precludes James from sending these letters, according to the email it sent to the attorney general.

Well, that was fast!

Less than 24 hours after FIRE threatened legal action, the NY attorney general has backed down—rescinding her unconstitutional demand on @rumblevideo to censor protected speech, in violation of multiple federal court orders. https://t.co/WIOYp6SvVF pic.twitter.com/DbrHBK7FeZ

— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) October 20, 2023

A federal district court judge issued an injunction against New York’s Online Hate Speech Law on Feb. 14, 2023, according to a filing. The judge found that the law “both compels social media networks to speak about the contours of hate speech and chills the constitutionally protected speech of social media users, without articulating a compelling governmental interest or ensuring that the law is narrowly tailored to that goal.”

“The October 12th letters ‘request’ information about the Investigated Platforms’ editorial policies, processes, and decisions for content that ‘may incite violence,’” FIRE argued in its letter. “At a minimum and on their face, the letters plainly seek to allow the Office to ‘take proof and make determinations of fact’ under the Online Hate Speech Law.”

James’ press office and Rumble did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!