Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is mimicking Chicken Little once again over the recently passed House Republicans’ Parents’ Bill of Rights Act, vowing that it will not “see the light of day here in the Senate” and calling it “Orwellian to the core.”
The New York Times breathlessly ran a subheadline that claimed the bill would “require schools to obtain parental consent to honor a student’s request to change gender-identifying pronouns,” as if somehow that’s a bad thing.
The Republican-sponsored bill passed the House on Friday and is on its way to the Senate where Schumer has vowed to kill it.
“This MAGA House Republican school control bill is Orwellian to the core. It will not see the light of day here in the Senate,” he tweeted, ironically displaying massive projection while doing so.
This MAGA House Republican school control bill is Orwellian to the core.
It will not see the light of day here in the Senate.https://t.co/VrTXBo9pUN
— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) March 24, 2023
“A divided House on Friday approved legislation that would mandate that schools make library catalogs and curriculums public, and that they obtain parental consent before honoring a student’s request to change their gender-identifying pronouns, part of a Republican effort to wring political advantage from a raging debate over contentious social issues,” The New York Times reported.
“The bill, approved almost entirely along party lines on a vote of 213 to 208, is a centerpiece of the Republican agenda that its sponsors call[ed] the Parents Bill of Rights Act,” it added. “It has no chance of passing the Democratic-controlled Senate or being signed by President Biden, whose advisers say it endangers transgender children without actually supporting parents.”
The leftist media outlet then reported on how rightwing the bill is, trying to show how radical the GOP has made it and instead, highlighting the fact that it gives the power back to the parents, which is what many Americans want.
“Its passage reflected the latest bid by House Republicans to focus on topics that animate the right-wing base by promoting what they cast as common-sense changes that could appeal to voters across the ideological spectrum. Republican proponents describe the bill as a measure ‘to ensure the rights of parents are honored and protected in the nation’s public schools,’ and argue that the goal is to provide students the best learning experience possible,” the outlet continued.
The Parents Bill of Rights:
1. Right to know what’s being taught in schools and see reading materials.
2. Right to be heard.
3. Right to see school budgets and spending.
4. Right to protect your child’s privacy.
5. Right to be notified of any violent activity at school. pic.twitter.com/NunN5X6FFi
— Kevin McCarthy (@SpeakerMcCarthy) March 24, 2023
“Sending a child to public school does not terminate parental rights at the door,” Representative Erin Houchin (R-Ind.) told the Old Gray Lady. “It gives power back to parents.”
Of course, the news outlet then trotted out the old “book banning” false allegation and decried how it discriminates against those confused about their gender.
“Democrats argue instead that the bill could create a legal basis for censorship in schools and book bans, and would create divisions based on sexual orientation and gender identity. During debate on the House floor this week, some Democrats dubbed the legislation the ‘Politics Over Parents Act,’ calling it extreme and a vehicle to bring political battles over social issues into classrooms while attempting to codify parental rights that already exist,” the New York Times stated.
“This bill does not give parents any more rights than they already have,” Representative Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.) told the outlet. She went on to say it provided a “one size fits all approach across the country, assuming the size that fits is a right wing straight jacket.”
Schumer was royally dragged on Twitter for his dishonest description of the bill:
Listen, Hakeem Jr., its not Orwellian for parents to find out what their kids are being taught. In fact, since its all using tax $$ – the entire community should have access to the curriculum and know which books are in the libraries and classrooms.
— Liz Mac (@TheLizMac) March 24, 2023
Yeah, God forbid parents have control of their children’s education. Smh
— Josh “Based” Barnett- former AZ-01 Candidate (@BarnettforAZ) March 25, 2023
Democrats continue to make ‘MAGA’ a slur for anyone who opposes their radical agenda. Parents have the right to be involved in their child’s education. https://t.co/ndt878DnBl
— Jonathan Hiller (@JonathanDHiller) March 25, 2023
Typical democrats trying to steal the rights from you and give them to government. https://t.co/aQsYVXdSKU
— Mad Nebraskan (@MadNebraskan) March 25, 2023
Full transparency on curriculum and parental consent is the exact opposite of “Orwellian”
— Space Daddy (@BigLouActual) March 24, 2023
You’re OK w/ pornography being taught & persuading children to take hormones & become transgender before 9 years old & share bathrooms. Twisted.
— magnoliafarm (@magnoliafarm) March 24, 2023
It might not see the light of day in ur Senate, But we will see it at the 2024 ballot box.. There are just certain things you don’t mess with.. Someone’s Religion and Parents Kids.
— adorf (@adorf44) March 25, 2023
Republicans Orwellian???
The art of deflection…
How the Democrats have mastered this art.— Rachel Munoz-Shivers (@ShiversMunoz) March 25, 2023
Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Bud Light makes $200K donation to LGBT group after backlash for not having Dylan Mulvaney’s back - June 1, 2023
- Calif. lawmakers to honor member of blasphemous anti-Catholic trans nun group, despite Dodgers backlash - June 1, 2023
- ESPN ripped for raising Pride flag, called a ‘direct attack’ against employees who oppose trans athletes in sports - June 1, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.