Liberal’s profane rant against Dems makes really good points, catches James Woods’ eye

The midterm elections are fast-approaching and, with Democrats signaling their campaigns will be focused on a response to the overturn of Roe v. Wade, at least one fed-up voter demonstrated with a rant against his party that he is just learning “elections have consequences.”

With the decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization returning the right to legislate on abortion to the states, progressives are pushing for an end to the filibuster, court packing, and executive overreach among other schemes in the name of on-demand pregnancy termination.

Knowing full well that Republicans had always sought the end of Roe and that the May 2 SCOTUS leak foretold this outcome, Democrats are getting called out for having the nerve to leverage the result when, arguably, the blame rests squarely on their shoulders.

That’s the conclusion drawn by an infuriated man on TikTok in a profanity-laced video that went viral this week. Attributed to @alex_pearlman, the man railed, “Your response, after five weeks of careful study and planning and thought has been to send us nonstop fundraising emails.”

Warning: Language

The tirade prompted actor James Woods to share the video and comment, “Elections have consequences, bud.”

As Pearlman noted, “I’m not going to shut up about this, I’m not, because I can’t yell at the Republicans. They’re not gonna change, they are who they are, we’re stuck with them. We’re not gonna change them. You can’t shame them, you can’t convince them, you can’t trick them, you can’t f*cking outplan them.”

“But I can yell at the Democratic Party. And I can tell them where they can at least make one f*cking small change to stop pissing me the f*ck off every hour right now. Stop sending me — stop sending me fundraising requests right now,” he raged. “Okay?”

Tweets and emails with links to the Democratic fundraising organization ActBlue began going out within moments of the release of the Dobbs ruling, supporting Pearlman’s case that the only strategy the left had, knowing this was on the horizon, was one that put their desires over that of their voters.

However, the rant didn’t end there as he began listing off the net worth of millionaire members of Congress who had petitioned for donations to satisfy their continued hold on power despite lacking the initiative to accomplish what their voters sent them there to do.

“Dianne Feinstein, who doesn’t know where the f*ck she is right now, the Senator from California, part of the Democratic Party, is worth $87.9 million. Million. You guys want money?” he asked rhetorically. “F*cking call your guy! You call him every week to do insider trading. Stop f*cking sending me emails. Stop sending me f*cking texts. Stop f*cking reading poems and singing g**d*mn karaoke.”

Pearlman had some additional choice remarks for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in light of her husband’s recent arrest while driving intoxicated. “If I had $114.7 million, Nancy Pelosi, you know what I’d do? First thing, I’d get my f*cking husband a driver so he doesn’t get a g**d*mn DUI,” he stated before pressing for retirement. “Second thing you know what I’d do? I’d be on a f*cking boat.”


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Kevin Haggerty


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles