Andrew Kerr, DCNF
The White House flagged the art market as a potential vector for financial corruption in a report Monday, but it made no mention of the ethical concerns raised by watchdogs surrounding Hunter Biden’s newfound and lucrative career in the industry.
The report, which spelled out the federal government’s strategy to combat public corruption, said the markets for art and antiquities “are especially vulnerable to a range of financial crimes” such as illicit value transfer, sanctions evasion and corruption because of “built-in opacity, lack of stable and predictable pricing, and inherent cross-border transportability.”
The report comes less than two months after Biden reportedly sold at least five pieces of artwork for $75,000 apiece in Los Angeles, despite having no formal training or experience.
Biden, 51, became a full-time artist in 2019 after spending most of his professional life working in private equity, lobbying and law, The New York Times reported. Hunter Biden told Artnet News in June that he seeks to bring out “the universal truth” through his artwork.
“I don’t paint from emotion or feeling, which I think are both very ephemeral,” Biden said. “For me, painting is much more about kind of trying to bring forth what is, I think, the universal truth.”
“The universal truth is that everything is connected and that there’s something that goes far beyond what is our five senses and that connects us all,” he added. “The thing that really fascinates me is the connection between the macro and the micro, and how these patterns repeat themselves over and over.”
Multiple art critics told Politico that Biden’s artwork was fetching extreme valuations because of his name, not his artistic abilities.
“Paintings are only as valuable as what some customer will pay for ’em,” art critic Geoffrey Young told Politico. “He’s complexly famous, but not yet for art. Guess people will pay for a known last name.”
Numerous ethics experts have raised concerns that buyers of Biden’s artwork are trying to curry favor with the president, but the White House has pledged that the identities of the purchasers have been kept anonymous from both Hunter Biden and his father’s administration.
But ethics experts poked holes in the White House’s pledge after Hunter Biden was spotted at a Los Angeles art gallery in October alongside prospective buyers.
“It shows the deal’s not going to be secret,” said former White House chief ethics lawyer Richard Painter, a Democrat. “I think the White House needs to go to Plan B.”
200 people showed up.
How many would have attended if his name was Hunter Smith?
This is one of the most underhanded ways a politician’s family has ever devised to funnel money into their pocket based, not on abilities, but on their last name. https://t.co/BninJmoz22
— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) October 7, 2021
“Because we don’t know who is paying for this art and we don’t know for sure that [Hunter Biden] knows, we have no way of monitoring whether people are buying access to the White House,” said Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics. “What these people are paying for is Hunter Biden’s last name.”
The White House did not return a request for comment.
For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Female swimmer says college blew off teammates concerns of sharing locker room with Lia Thomas: Report - January 28, 2022
- Sixsmith: The American dream is starting to look like a creepy carnival - January 28, 2022
- Chamber of Commerce signals opposition to latest Biden high-profile nominee - January 28, 2022