Thomas Catenacci, DCNF
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a previous decision to temporarily block the Department of Labor’s vaccine mandate Friday evening in a blow to President Joe Biden’s agenda.
The three-judge panel wrote that the mandate likely “violates the constitutional structure that safeguards our collective liberty.” The appellate court’s ruling added that the mandate was “staggeringly overbroad.”
On Sept. 9, Biden authorized the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to craft a rule requiring businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate workers to either get a COVID-19 vaccine or submit weekly tests proving they aren’t infected with the virus. While the administration said the mandate was in response to an emergency surge of coronavirus cases, it was officially published on Nov. 4 and won’t go into effect until early 2022.
“Applying to 2 out of 3 private-sector employees in America, in workplaces as diverse as the country itself, the Mandate fails to consider what is perhaps the most salient fact of all: the ongoing threat of COVID-19 is more dangerous to some employees than to other employees,” the Fifth Circuit ruling continued.
The judges added that a 28-year-old trucker who spends his work day alone is less at risk from coronavirus than a 62-year-old prison janitor. The mandate fails to consider the nuances of different workplaces and workers’ different exposure risks, the court said.
“Likewise, a naturally immune unvaccinated worker is presumably at less risk than an unvaccinated worker who has never had the virus,” the ruling stated. “The list goes on, but one constant remains—the Mandate fails almost completely to address, or even respond to, much of this reality and common sense.”
Immediately after OSHA issued the rule, multiple states and business groups sued the Biden administration, arguing the mandate was unconstitutional. The Fifth Circuit blocked the mandate pending further action in a ruling issued on Nov. 6, just days after the lawsuits were filed.
“The Court’s action not only halts Biden from moving forward with his unlawful overreach, but it also commands the judicious review we sought,” Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, who led a multi-state lawsuit challenging Biden’s authority to issue such a rule, said in a statement after the ruling last week. “The President will not impose medical procedures on the American people without the checks and balances afforded by the Constitution.”
But Solicitor of Labor Seema Nanda said the Labor Department was “confident in its legal authority” and that it intended to defend the mandate in court moving forward in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from the DCNF.
This is a breaking news story. Please return for updates.
For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Democratic mayor says he refuses to bring back mask mandates as city faces ‘High’ COVID-19 alert level - May 21, 2022
- Garland finally condemns threats against supreme court justices amid Roe leak - May 21, 2022
- Missouri bill would prevent ‘Zuckbucks’ from flooding local election offices - May 21, 2022
PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.