A judge has ruled against South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem’s lawsuit challenging the Biden administration over July 4th fireworks being held at Mount Rushmore this year and the Republican has vowed to fight back.
Judge Roberto A. Lange, an appointee of former President Obama, referred to holding fireworks at an Independence Day celebration at the base of Mount Rushmore as “appealing” when reviewed “at first blush.” He also said: “However this Court is not called upon to determine whether such a fireworks display is a good idea.”
The judge proclaimed in his 36-page ruling on Wednesday that America could “use a good celebration of its foundational principles of democracy, liberty, and equal protection of the law” following the pandemic and other divisive events that have occurred across the nation over the last year. Lange also seems quite aware that his ruling has political implications as well.
Noem is vowing to appeal the ruling. “The Biden Administration canceled South Dakota’s Mount Rushmore Fireworks Celebration on completely arbitrary grounds,” she vented on Twitter.
(Video Credit: KTIV News 4)
“I am disappointed that the court gave cover to this unlawful action with today’s decision. But rest assured, this fight is not over,” she promised. “My legal team will appeal so that we can return the Fireworks Celebration to Mount Rushmore and celebrate our nation’s birthday at America’s Shrine to Democracy for next year and in the future.”
My legal team will appeal so that we can return the Fireworks Celebration to Mount Rushmore and celebrate our nation’s birthday at America’s Shrine to Democracy for next year and in the future. (2/2) pic.twitter.com/SOMHmw6RrS
— Governor Kristi Noem (@govkristinoem) June 2, 2021
Last year, former President Trump gave a patriotic speech at the monument following the first fireworks display there since 2009. Noem had requested that the court order a permit to be granted after her initial request to the National Parks Service was turned down. She called the decision “arbitrary and capricious.”
The District Court posited: “This Court cannot say that NPS’s decision was arbitrary and capricious under (law).”
Lange went on to write in his ruling: “This Court fully understands the State’s position and why this suit was brought, but under governing law, the State is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its claims and has not met the requirements for the sort of mandatory injunction or writ of mandamus sought. For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the State’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Doc. 3, is denied.”
He noted that if the situation had been reversed, and a group sought to block a permit that was issued by the National Park Service (NPS) for the display “this Court almost certainly would have denied a preliminary injunction to any group seeking to prohibit such a display from occurring.”
“Ultimately, there are strong arguments in both directions as to the balance of harms, and the public interest in the short-term appears to lie with having the fireworks display, whereas more long-term interests militate against it at least for this year,” he contended.
A number of excuses were given for the NPS rejection including Indian tribal partners objecting to the display, environmental and wildfire concerns, disruption of enjoyment by the public, disruption of construction, and the ongoing health and safety risks of the pandemic crisis.
“Potential risks to the park itself and to the health and safety of employees and visitors associated with the fireworks demonstration continue to be a concern and are still being evaluated as a result of the 2020 event,” NPS regional director Herbert Frost previously wrote in a letter to the head of the state’s tourism department. “In addition, the park’s many tribal partners expressly oppose fireworks at the Memorial.”
“These factors, compiled with the COVID-19 pandemic, do not allow a safe and responsible fireworks display to be held at this site,” he commented.
People sounded off on Twitter calling for the fireworks to go on anyway:
Just do it .. and then pay the fines (if any) ! It’s all about control anyhow ! So just disregard their stupid “guideline”. Besides, the Biden Administration has much bigger problems than South Dakota’s fireworks celebration.
— Janell Duley (@janellduley) June 3, 2021
This Administration wants to destroy our country, not build it up and celebrate it. Bet they would approve fireworks on Chinese New Year’s Eve.
— Tommy Lambert (@TommyLambertOKC) June 3, 2021
I suggest doing it anyway. It’s always easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.
— Wally Wingert’s Wonderfully Wacky World (@WallyWingert) June 2, 2021
Well, Biden surely doesnt remember doing that. LOL! Have them anyhow. You are the Gov. 🙂
Keep doing good.
— Travis Yeager (@Travis_Yeager) June 3, 2021
So sad! We are planning our first trip to Mt. Rushmore over July 4th. We were so looking forward to it!
— Kevin Foster (@kevindfoster) June 3, 2021
Go get ‘em Guvna. ‘Merica
— Ryan Williams (@RyanWilliamsTN) June 3, 2021
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Alabama starts first wave of early release for hundreds of prison inmates including murderers and rapists - February 1, 2023
- ‘Don’t be insecure about your marriage’: Beauty influencer mocks wife of NFL player after he’s mistaken as secret lover - February 1, 2023
- Democrats aghast over ‘racially offensive’ new title of Republican subcommittee - February 1, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.