Nevada’s Democratic governor is proposing legislation that would allow technology companies to form their own local governments as part of a push to attract business to the state.
“If you’ve got enough money, acres upon acres of undeveloped land, and an ‘innovative technology,’ you could soon form a new local government in Nevada” under a plan introduced last month by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported earlier this week.
The plan involves the creation of “Innovation Zones” and is aimed at boosting Nevada’s economy which has suffered business slowdowns and losses during the pandemic due to state-mandated closures and lockdowns.
In particular though, the plan seems focused on attracting technology companies.
A draft of the legislation obtained by the paper but which has yet to be introduced in the state legislature would authorize tech companies “to effectively form separate local governments” in the state “that would carry the same authority as a county, including the ability to impose taxes, form school districts and justice courts and provide government services,” the paper reported.
The governor made his appeal for the new legislation during his State of the State Address in January which he said dovetailed with his overall plans to attract “groundbreaking technologies” to Nevada, but without utilizing the usual methods including tax reductions and other incentives that are funded by the public.
In his address, Sisolak mentioned Blockchains, LLC specifically as a firm that could come to Nevada and construct a “smart city” that would operate entirely on blockchain technology in an area east of Reno.
According to the draft of the legislation obtained by the paper, traditional models of local government are “inadequate alone to provide the flexibility and resources conducive to making the State a leader in attracting and retaining new forms and types of businesses and fostering economic development in emerging technologies and innovative industries.”
As such, the “alternative form of local government” is necessary in order to successfully attract the kind of desired economic development to Nevada, it adds.
The plan envisions the use of blockchain and additional “innovative technology” including the internet, artificial intelligence, autonomous technology robotics, wireless, biometrics, and renewable resources.
A spokeswoman for Sisolak told the Review-Journal in a statement that he “looks forward to rolling out more information on Innovation Zones and other items from his State of the State speech in the future.”
She added: “The Governor’s Office has not submitted a bill draft request related to this initiative so we will not be commenting on any language at this time.”
The plan calls for the technology ‘cities’ to operate within counties and eventually take over the functions of the county government to become their own independent entity. The tech governments would be managed by a three-person supervisory board that would be similarly empowered as an existing county commissioner’s board. Also, the company managing the zone would have a lot of sway over who sat on the board.
The plan envisions the state benefitting economically by imposing an “industry-specific tax that will be imposed upon the innovative technology or activity related to the innovative technology.”
It also requires the applicant firm to own at least 50,000 acres of uninhabited land that resides within a single county without incorporating existing towns or tax entities. It requires companies to have $250 million cash on hand and pledge to invest $1 billion in the zone over a decade.
Lance Gilman, a Storey County Commissioner and a developer of the concept, told the paper that the Blockchains Innovation Zone is “going to have an impact on Storey County, and the jury is still out on whether that will be positive or negative.”
He said his county remains open to the concept but that officials want to know what benefits the county will receive before ceding land to any tech firm.
“We’re going to want to know that Storey County gets the benefit of the bargain,” he told the paper.
Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader James Settelmeyer (R), who represents a portion of Storey County, expressed some enthusiasm for the concept but he also has concerns.
“The legislation seems to be rather one-sided, that the Innovation Zones get to make determinations and the county has to go along with them,” he told the Review-Journal, adding he was “not impressed” to learn of the plan involving his county with it so far along.
Some online users were highly skeptical of the concept, however, including questions about conflict resolution and how such zones would be policed.
“But how about use of force? Isn’t that the end-all for states? All considered this is fluff… a company can sorta do some of these things now. Navada legislatures just throwing shade to non-libertarians. Just PR, no bite,” one user wrote.
But how about use of force? Isn’t that the end-all for states? All considered this is fluff… a company can sorta do some of these things now. Navada legislatures just throwing shade to non-libertarians. Just PR, no bite.
— Joe Rosato 🔑 (@joerosato) February 5, 2021
Another mockingly envisioned conflict between the tech zones.
"This is the third rocket strike in 2022 and the most deadly so far. President Zuckerburg is under increasing pressure to return to the negotiating table. Human rights groups warn are concerned that the continuing flood of Google refugees could overwhelm relief workers."
— Ian Ramsey (@eman_ian) February 5, 2021
Still others questioned whether such a concept is practical and legal.
Warning: Strong language
Wtf is going on in this goddamn country? We are allowing corporations to create their own separate govts? Is this shit constitutional? If corporations can create their own corporatocracy goddamnit then the working class should be free to create their own Govt
— Throw Congress Overboard (@Throwcongress) February 5, 2021
I owe my soul to the company store. And school district. And garbage collectors. And court system (!!). And fire department. And police (!!!!)….
— ULTRAVACCINE 💉 (@ULTRAGOTHA) February 5, 2021
Some noted the historical context of the concept.
Disney did it first
— 🐬💀spፀፀkվ biէርዠ💀🐬 (@melaniefoxfire) February 5, 2021
The concept of company towns sadly predates Disney.
— Dylan Miles (@king_of_bob) February 5, 2021
Used to be the norm, companies would build horrible housing conditions, bring workers in, pay them barely enough to survive, own the stores, etc.
This is definitely an industrial revolution concept coming back in 2021.
— Nick 🐬 (@nicknicknick01) February 6, 2021
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jan. 6 committee chair Benny Thompson offers a stunning take on potential Trump criminal actions - January 2, 2022
- Life-long New Yorker posts ‘sad’ Twitter ode on post-pandemic Big Apple being ‘shadow of its former self’ - January 2, 2022
- NYPD officer shot in head in police lot as he slept in vehicle between shifts - January 2, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.