Washington Post ends ‘fact-check program’ for Trump, has ‘no plans’ to launch one for Biden

In a decision likely to feed critics’ opinions that the major media outlets are hypocritical and biased against Republicans, the Washington Post said Wednesday it is ending a false-claims project launched at the beginning of former President Donald Trump’s term and now has “no plans” to launch a similar project as President Joe Biden begins his tenure.

“The database of Trump claims was started a month after Trump became president as a way to not overwhelm our fact-checking enterprise, where the core mission is to explain complex policy issues,” Post director of communications Shani George told The Daily Caller.

“While we do not have plans to launch a Biden database at this time, we will continue to dig into the accuracy of statements by political figures of all party affiliations,” George added.

For the duration of Trump’s four years in office, the Post claims he made 30,573 misleading or false statements, a figure that was posted online shortly after Biden was sworn in on Wednesday.

Glenn Kessler, an editor and chief fact-checker for the Post, remarked on Twitter he “never would have believed this number was possible when” the project “started four years ago.”

The Post itself, however, has had problems getting facts straight as well throughout Trump’s tenure, including Kessler himself.

In April, Kessler was forced to correct himself following a viral Twitter thread that was meant to fact-check the former president after Trump took issue with a Department of Health and Human Services inspector general report that said hospitals were experiencing a shortage of equipment needed to handle COVID-19.

In an April 7 tweet, Trump called out the HHS IG and asked whether the agency did a report “on the failed H1N1 Swine Flu debacle where 17,000 people died?”

“Guess what, the HHS IG did do a lengthy examination of the government’s response to the swine flu in 2009. Let’s tweet out a few key findings,” Kessler responded on Twitter the same day.

But that wasn’t true. The HHS IG, which is independent from the rest of Health and Human Services, did not actually commission the report that the WaPo fact-checker mentioned.

“The report was not an [IG] product,” the agency’s spokeswoman, Melissa Rumley, told the Daily Caller at the time.

Kessler would go on to delete his tweet and issue a mea culpa.

In addition, the Post claimed throughout the first half of Trump’s term that the so-called ‘Russian collusion’ claims were accurate when subsequent investigations found that they were not. And more recently, the Post was dinged by then-acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell for publishing a claim that President Trump was repeatedly warned about the coronavirus.

“This isn’t true. And we told you this before you wrote. And you put the DNI denial of your premise in paragraph 9,” Grenell wrote April 28.

On Thursday, One America News’ Jack Prosobiec tweeted out screengrabs of two headlines — one from the Post’s fact-checker stating “Trump campaign promotes false claim that Biden would end fracking,” and one from editor Katie Pavlich at Townhall stating, “Biden Administration: Yes We are Following Through With a Fracking Ban.”


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Jon Dougherty


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles