Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE.
Two-time presidential failure Hillary Clinton took President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to task in a tweet Wednesday after insinuating that he has the power to decide whether or not the November elections take place.
In response to a New York Times story claiming that Kushner “doesn’t rule out delaying 2020 election,” Clinton wrote: “I can’t believe I have to write this sentence, but the president’s son-in-law doesn’t get to decide when the election is.”
I can’t believe I have to write this sentence, but the president's son-in-law doesn't get to decide when the election is. https://t.co/7CrpHny6TF
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) May 13, 2020
Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and a senior White House adviser, refused on Tuesday to rule out postponing the presidential election in November, a comment that fed directly into Democratic concerns that President Trump might use the coronavirus crisis to delay or delegitimize the contest and one that contradicted Mr. Trump himself.
“I’m not sure I can commit one way or the other, but right now that’s the plan,” Kushner reportedly told Time magazine, supposedly in response to a question about whether the November elections would be postponed due to the continued prevalence of COVID-19, even assuming that it’s still around.
But what’s maddening is that the Times’ reporters — Annie Karni and Maggie Haberman — literally took that one comment from Kushner out of context, which means that Clinton did, too.
Time noted in the sentence before publishing Kushner’s quote that any decisions about election dates are way above his pay grade:
When asked if there was a chance the presidential election could be postponed past November 3 due to the pandemic, Kushner said that isn’t his decision. “I’m not sure I can commit one way or the other, but right now that’s the plan,” he said.
But the two ‘reporters’ took him out of context intentionally with their lede and headline: “Kushner, Law Aside, Doesn’t Rule Out Delaying 2020 Election.”
Never mind that President Trump himself has flatly dismissed Democratic ‘concerns’ that he is considering delaying the election.
Crooked Hillary is lying again! He literally said "It's not my decision to make."
As President Trump has said, "The general election will happen on November 3rd." https://t.co/LcCIlWNNdX
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) May 13, 2020
Interestingly, the Times reporters went on to note: “Doubts about a smooth voting process in November have increased as states have canceled or postponed presidential primary elections to avoid the spread of the virus.”
Why is that noteworthy? Because Democrats have been the ones who have delayed primaries ‘due to coronavirus.’ In fact, they were apoplectic in March when Wisconsin refused to delay its primaries despite the rising coronavirus outbreak at the time.
Tuesday evening, Kushner himself pushed back against the out-of-context narrative. “I have not been involved in, nor am I aware of, any discussions about trying to change the date of the presidential election,” he said.
A White House official also reportedly told the Times Kushner’s aware that the presidential election date is set in legal stone.
So why the story in the first place? Only the Times can answer that question but it seems fairly obvious that it was an attempt to mislead its readers and an intentional one at that.
Besides, as the story noted, Kushner — like his president father-in-law — has been bullish on reopening the country anyway.
“I think you’ll see by June that a lot of the country should be back to normal, and the hope is that by July the country’s really rocking again,” he said.
As for Clinton, she got rightly owned online.
I can’t believe I have to write this, STFU pic.twitter.com/NQhqn2kvTg
— Valiant_defender ⭐️⭐️⭐️ #ReinstateRobynGritz (@vabelle2010) May 13, 2020
And an ex Secretary of State doesn’t get to decide what the current president of the United States does. Irony.
— The Mouthy Mom (@mouthyM0M) May 13, 2020
According to new declassified documents we now know Russia was helping Hillary in the 2016 election.
Well of course. Hillary made millions selling 20% of our uranium to Putin #redwave #RussiaHoax #ObamaGate pic.twitter.com/Q4MaCFrTpe
— Melissa A. (@TheRightMelissa) May 13, 2020
— Kimmy Jong (@kimmyj0ng) May 13, 2020
Remember this? 😂 pic.twitter.com/wfFdOmAtzf
— Light Warrior (@KnightofTruth1) May 13, 2020
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jan. 6 committee chair Benny Thompson offers a stunning take on potential Trump criminal actions - January 2, 2022
- Life-long New Yorker posts ‘sad’ Twitter ode on post-pandemic Big Apple being ‘shadow of its former self’ - January 2, 2022
- NYPD officer shot in head in police lot as he slept in vehicle between shifts - January 2, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!