Dershowitz says new law is needed to protect lawyer-client privilege. Here’s what he suggests …

Famed Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz has real concerns about the FBI’s raid last week of the office and hotel room of President Donald Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen

Dershowitz, who had dinner with the president last week, appeared on Fox News to say he does not believe Trump will fire special counsel Robert Mueller, but compared raiding Cohen’s office to the bureau raiding a doctor’s office. He cited lawyer/client privilege and said the tactic should only be used as a last resort.

“There’s something very wrong with that,” Dershowitz declared, after explaining what likely took place during the raid.

He noted that Cohen doesn’t appear to be up against serious charges, although the Justice Department did announce Friday that the attorney has been “under criminal investigation” for months because of his business dealings.

Nonetheless, the embattled lawyer does not appear to be sweating bullets over his legal troubles.

In the wake of the raid, the law professor said in an op-ed that a new law is needed to protect lawyer-client communications in an op-ed.

“The raid on President Trump’s lawyer dramatically demonstrates the need for new legislation to assure that no FBI agents or U.S. attorneys ever get to read privileged communications between a lawyer and a client, a doctor and patient, a priest and penitent, or a husband and wife,” he wrote.

Dershowitz, explained that a “taint team,” which consists of a number of FBI agents and prosecutors, reads all material obtained during such a raid, approving material that is not privileged, but those who make up the team also see confidential material and “must be trusted not to leak it or misuse it in any way.”

And we already know how that tends to work out.

“A law should be enacted under which anytime the government is seeking to search an office or home that may contain confidential and privileged information, the search team must be accompanied by a judicial officer – a judge, a magistrate or someone appointed to fulfill that function,” Dershowitz said.

He added that the judicial officer, who “can be trusted not to leak far better than FBI agents or prosecutors,” should be the only one ever to read material may eventually be  deemed confidential.



Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Tom Tillison


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles