NYT capitulates on Russia collusion: Admits Hope Hicks story doesn’t add up with Democrat narrative

[sharenow]

As the Russia -Trump collusion narrative continues to crumble, even The New York Times is beginning to take their heads out of the proverbial sand and see an occasional point of incontrovertible logic.

In a Friday piece about the Russian government’s attempts to contact President Donald Trump aide Hope Hicks, the Times essentially seemed forced to admit that not only was there “no evidence that Ms. Hicks did anything improper,” but that “the Russian outreach to Ms. Hicks undercuts the idea that the Russian government had established deep ties to the Trump campaign before the election.”

(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

A stunning admission, especially from a media outlet highly criticized by Trump for its seemingly hellbent determination to bring him down at any cost.

From the piece:

The Russian outreach efforts show that, even after American intelligence agencies publicly accused Moscow of trying to influence the outcome of last year’s presidential election, Russian operatives were undaunted in their efforts to establish contacts with Mr. Trump’s advisers.

There is no evidence that Ms. Hicks did anything improper. According to former officials, American intelligence and law enforcement agencies became alarmed by introductory emails that Ms. Hicks received from Russian government addresses in the weeks after Mr. Trump’s election.

Later in the article came the stunning admission: “In some ways, the Russian outreach to Ms. Hicks undercuts the idea that the Russian government had established deep ties to the Trump campaign before the election. If it had, Russian officials might have found a better entrèe to the White House than unprompted emails to Ms. Hicks.”

In other words, why were the Russians poking at the edges by contacting people like Hicks and former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, George Papadopoulos, if they were essentially in bed with the Trump campaign?

Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE

Any op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of BizPac Review.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
[sharenow]
Scott Morefield

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles