The State Department has been ordered by a federal judge to search the government email accounts of several Hillary Clinton aides.
Judge Amit Mehta, appointed by former President Obama, ordered a search of accounts belonging to Clinton’s top aides at the State Department, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan, The Daily Caller reported. The order from the Washington D.C. District Court Judge was in response to a Judicial Watch lawsuit.
— Eyeleen Right (@eyerighton18) August 10, 2017
“This matter is a far cry from a typical FOIA case. Secretary Clinton used a private email server, located in her home, to transmit and receive work-related communications during her tenure as secretary of state,” Mehta said.
“[State] has not, however, searched the one records system over which it has always had control and that is almost certain to contain some responsive records: the state.gov email server,” she continued, adding that the State Department “has offered no assurance” that the records it has received so far from the former Secretary of State and her aides “constitute the entirely of Secretary Clinton’s emails during the time period relevant to Plaintiff’s FOIA request.”
BREAKING: JW wins big court ruling that may finally result in truth about Benghazi & Clinton’s involvement in it.⚖️?https://t.co/CMtWWitKDy
— Judicial Watch ? (@JudicialWatch) August 10, 2017
The agency did not do enough, in Mehta’s opinion, to search for all emails on its computer systems related to the 2012 Benghazi attacks that left four Americans dead.
“This major court ruling may finally result in more answers about the Benghazi scandal — and Hillary Clinton’s involvement in it — as we approach the attack’s fifth anniversary,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in a statement.
“It is remarkable that we had to battle both the Obama and Trump administrations to break through the State Department’s Benghazi stonewall,” Fitton added. “Why are Secretary Tillerson and Attorney General Sessions wasting taxpayer dollars protecting Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration?”
The ruling in favor of the Judicial Watch suit was celebrated by Twitter users as well as the conservative watchdog group.
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
It’s about time!
— Lori Calnon (@ljcalnon) August 10, 2017
The screws are tightening. Is it warm in here or is it just her?
— Joel Capizzi (@joel_capizzi) August 10, 2017
Lock Her up!!!!! And she can start a prison ministry ????
— PR1985 (@Ja_Crispy85) August 10, 2017
Yes! Finally. Thank you Judge! ??
— Catfiorini (@Catfiorini1) August 10, 2017
— Phyllis Gibson (@NursGibson49) August 10, 2017
@JudicialWatch is always working toward the truth while Congress does nothing. Thank you!
— ObamaGate.Bonnie (@BonnieM07136192) August 10, 2017
WAHOO‼️??CONGRATULATIONS JUDICIAL WATCH ON THIS WIN FOR AMERICA! FEELS AMAZING!
— Rita Williams (@RitaWil92435229) August 10, 2017
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Grandfather throws down with aggressive kangaroo that attacked his dogs, but who really won? - June 4, 2022
- ‘My name is Dr. Robinson’: Proud abortionist snaps at Chip Roy calling her ‘Miss’ during hearing - May 19, 2022
- Great ‘eye discipline!’ Beaming Kyle Rittenhouse pic with busty Lara Logan lookalike draws A LOT of eyes - May 5, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.