Federal judge reportedly mocks group that sued Trump’s voter integrity commission

U.S. District Court in Washington Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth is congratulated after a ceremony where the title of chief judge for the U.S. District Court in Washington was passed from Judge Thomas F. Hogan to Lamberth, Thursday, May 1, 2008, at the federal courthouse in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

President Trump’s voter integrity commission received a big boost when a federal judge not only ruled in favor of the president’s initiative, but mocked those who tried to oppose it.

An attorney for Common Cause, a group that sued the newly formed commission, got a little ribbing from the judge when they claimed to fear President Trump himself would gain access to voters’ data despite states efforts to keep the information private, The Washington Times reported.

“That’s hard to keep a straight face,” District Judge Royce C. Lamberth said.

Common Cause sued to stop the voter integrity commission and argued that requesting information on First Amendment activities violates the Privacy Act. But the judge, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987 and no doubt knows a thing or two about freedom, refused to issue a restraining order to stop the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

Justice Department attorney Elizabeth Shapiro argued the commission had only asked states to turn over already publicly available information about voters. The commission is seeking the information to double-check for multiple registrations, non-citizens, and deceased people still on the voter rolls.

“I think that makes a difference,” the judge said, according to the Times.

The judge also noted that the commission is merely requesting – not demanding – information.

“No states have been compelled to do anything,” he said.

But, it wasn’t all good news for President Trump and his commission.

Lamberth admitted that his word would likely not be the last on the matter and acknowledged two other cases challenging the commission.

The judge also seemed to agree with Common Cause in that the commission requests were far-reaching, and even called it “snooping,” the Washington Times reported.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles