Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE.
Former acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell engaged in an epic back-and-forth on Twitter Thursday with Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), who continues to push the discredited narrative that the 2016 Trump campaign ‘colluded’ with Russia.
The feud began last week after Grenell, in one of his last official acts, declassified an email written by former National Security Adviser Susan Rice to herself, in which she documented a meeting with then-President Barack Obama, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-DNI James Clapper, among others, to discuss the investigation into incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
As BizPac Review noted, the exchange began when the California Democrat, who became one of the first in a crowded field of 2020 presidential contenders to drop out of the race, responded to a tweet from Daily Beast editor-in-chief Noah Shachtman, who wrote that he trusts FBI Director Christopher Wray but not Grenell or then-incoming DNI John Ratcliffe.
“They’re the ones with the shovels burying evidence to protect [Trump],” Swalwell wrote.
“I’m letting the public see more info. You are the one who worked to hide the information you didn’t like. You listened to multiple people in classified hearings say they had no evidence and yet go on TV and say the opposite. Transparency is now a must!” Grenell wrote.
I’m letting the public see more info. You are the one who worked to hide the information you didn’t like. You listened to multiple people in classified hearings say they had no evidence and yet go on TV and say the opposite. Transparency is now a must! https://t.co/C0pKnneuoh
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 22, 2020
Then the exchange really took off, with Grenell continually roasting Swalwell for his fake Russia narrative while promising to release more documents allegedly implicating Obama-era officials in the plot.
Thanks for showing up on Twitter. You never once came to brief the Intel Committee (First DNI Director who failed to do so). If you have nothing to hide, why don’t you release Flynn’s call with Russia? #ShowUsTheTape https://t.co/2CbV9O1xMA
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 22, 2020
“Thanks for showing up on Twitter. You never once came to brief the Intel Committee (First DNI Director who failed to do so). If you have nothing to hide, why don’t you release Flynn’s call with Russia?” Swalwell wrote, to which Grenell responded, “Those are coming.”
Those are coming. It’s very important for the public to see ALL of them. For too long the public has been misled. Just compare your committee’s transcripts to your public statements! #troubling https://t.co/gzyNJuQJDY
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 22, 2020
The back-and-forth took a hiatus for a few days, but on Thursday, Swalwell took another potshot at Grenell over the as-yet-unreleased transcript of the Flynn call with then-Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak — a conversation that would ultimately lead to his dismissal from the Trump administration and eventual plea to one count of perjury.
“Tick tock. ‘Those are coming.’ Well, you’re no longer director and the Flynn tapes never came. All you have to show for your work is the dirt on your boots from shoveling and burying evidence for @realDonaldTrump. #ShowUsTheTape,” Swalwell goaded.
Tick tock. “Those are coming.” Well, you’re no longer director and the Flynn tapes never came. All you have to show for your work is the dirt on your boots from shoveling and burying evidence for @realDonaldTrump. #ShowUsTheTape https://t.co/ldYLn9LcQl
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 28, 2020
But Grenell assured Swalwell the release is pending, while blasting him for repeatedly lying about ‘Russian collusion’ during multiple television appearances over the past few years.
“They are coming. There’s a thoughtful process to transparency. For years you went on TV spreading the Russian propaganda – knowing the entire time that not one single person under oath from your committee saw any collusion. Not one. It’s shameful!” He wrote.
They are coming. There’s a thoughtful process to transparency. For years you went on TV spreading the Russian propaganda – knowing the entire time that not one single person under oath from your committee saw any collusion. Not one. It’s shameful! https://t.co/APPwAT05DQ
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2020
The California lawmaker repeated the widely debunked narrative that Trump asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to find Clinton’s missing emails — a ‘request’ that was clearly made in jest during one of the president’s 2016 campaign events.
The guy who spread “Russian propaganda” is the one who asked Russia to hack his opponent. It’s also the guy who said he believed Putin over the brave intelligence officers you betrayed. That guy is @realDonaldTrump. You chose to enable him. I choose to check him. https://t.co/ZgH2PHrXua
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 28, 2020
“You spent tens of millions of taxpayer dollars weaponizing the US government & telling Americans there was massive collusion. Your own committee interviewed more than 50 people under oath & they all said the same thing: they know of no collusion. But on TV you said the opposite,” Grenell responded.
You spent tens of millions of taxpayer dollars weaponizing the US government & telling Americans there was massive collusion. Your own committee interviewed more than 50 people under oath & they all said the same thing: they know of no collusion. But on TV you said the opposite. https://t.co/UpDdaSeRXi
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2020
“Weaponize? History lesson: Democrats were in the minority for the Russia Investigation — it was a GOP-led investigation that allowed witnesses to not answer questions. And the Mueller investigation came from @realDonaldTrump’s appointees. So, show us the Flynn tapes or buzz off,” Swalwell countered.
Weaponize? History lesson: Democrats were in the minority for the Russia Investigation — it was a GOP-led investigation that allowed witnesses to not answer questions. And the Mueller investigation came from @realDonaldTrump’s appointees. So, show us the Flynn tapes or buzz off. https://t.co/H4AzYhAolv
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 28, 2020
Democrats were permitted to ask “lots of questions” during the hearings, Grenell countered, noting that he had read transcripts of the investigation. “You just didn’t find any collusion when they were under oath,” he wrote, “so the transcripts were the only thing you didn’t leak to the DC media.”
I read the transcripts. There were lots of questions from Democrats. Lots. You just didn’t find any collusion when they were under oath – so the transcripts were the only thing you didn’t leak to the DC media. https://t.co/tx4seOXbHq
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2020
At that, Swalwell asked if Grenell had read ‘transcripts’ of a series of events, all of which have been debunked.
Did you read:
— Manafort gave polling data to Russians
— @realDonaldTrump lied about Trump Tower Moscow deal during the 2016 primary season
— Jr. meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower
— @realDonaldTrump asking Russia to hack @HillaryClinton
Read it again. https://t.co/B4zrD0n9ej
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 28, 2020
“Oh, I read. I read it all. And you lied about collusion. And Americans who see the facts that you tried to hide are furious,” Grenell shot back.
Oh, I read. I read it all. And you lied about collusion. And Americans who see the facts that you tried to hide are furious. https://t.co/WrARy1fWjG
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2020
At that point, Dan Goldman, former senior adviser and director of investigations for the House Intelligence Committee and now an MSNBC contributor, jumped in.
“Sad to see that @richardgrenell has assumed the same kind of deceptive and deficient logic that @RepRatcliffe used during impeachment. If any individual *fact* witness does not or cannot assert a *legal* conclusion, that does not mean that that legal conclusion cannot be found,” he wrote.
Sad to see that @richardgrenell has assumed the same kind of deceptive and deficient logic that @RepRatcliffe used during impeachment. If any individual *fact* witness does not or cannot assert a *legal* conclusion, that does not mean that that legal conclusion cannot be found. https://t.co/W0I74I8j0s
— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) May 28, 2020
“I’m being deceptive?! I’m for transparency. You DC types hide the details from the American people and then go on TV and say something they can’t check. It’s the DC way. And it usually works – until Americans see the details (i.e. the hidden transcripts),” Grenell blasted.
I’m being deceptive?! I’m for transparency. You DC types hide the details from the American people and then go on TV and say something they can’t check. It’s the DC way. And it usually works – until Americans see the details (i.e. the hidden transcripts). https://t.co/roUy5Xicxt
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2020
The exchange ended this way:
Hey Dan, remember the time @RichardGrenell came and briefed Congress and cleared all this up? I don’t either. Like his former boss, he’s just a tough guy on Twitter. But unlike every DNI before him, never had the nerve to appear before Congress and defend a single thing. https://t.co/pVbVH2Eic8
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 28, 2020
It’s time we brief the American people. We are done with the Washington manipulations. Transparency is needed. https://t.co/q9oy3Nru6U
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2020
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jan. 6 committee chair Benny Thompson offers a stunning take on potential Trump criminal actions - January 2, 2022
- Life-long New Yorker posts ‘sad’ Twitter ode on post-pandemic Big Apple being ‘shadow of its former self’ - January 2, 2022
- NYPD officer shot in head in police lot as he slept in vehicle between shifts - January 2, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!