Judge Napolitano gently warns Hannity: ‘I love him,’ but ‘he can’t have it both ways’


Judge Andrew Napolitano had some telling advice for Fox News host Sean Hannity over his stated expectation of confidentiality regarding his dealings with President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen.

“I love him. I’ve worked with him for 20 years. He can’t have it both ways,” the Fox News senior judicial analyst said of attorney-client privilege.

“If he was a client, then his confidential communications to Mr. Cohen are privileged,” Napolitano said. “If Mr. Cohen was never his lawyer, then nothing that he said to Mr. Cohen is privileged.”

Outnumbered Overtime” host Harris Faulkner referenced Hannity stating he “may have handed [Cohen] $10 once,” questioning whether this establishes attorney-client privilege — which is a common plot device on TV drama programs.

But Napolitano said that is not the case.

“I must tell you that that is a myth,” he said. “The attorney-client privilege requires a formal relationship reduced to writing for a specific legal purpose.

Attention-hungry Hogg’s ‘big’ announcement backfires as he shows his age, again

Hannity said on his radio show that he expressed the desire for such a relationship.

“I never gave him a retainer. Never paid any fees,” the Fox News host said. “I may have handed him $10 once. I requested attorney-client privilege with him, and assumed our conversations would be confidential, but they have never involved any matter with him and any third party.”

Faulkner asked if anything related to Hannity that may have been obtained during the raid of Cohen’s office can be revealed.

“In my view, yes,” Napolitano said.

Hannity did take to Twitter to say “Cohen has never represented me in any matter. I never retained him, received an invoice, or paid legal fees,” but the contradiction may not matter — he also said the conversations he had were “almost exclusively about real estate” and that they “never involved any matter between me and a third-party.”


Criminal defense attorney Richard Hornsby cited the Supreme Court case, Alexander v. United States, involving a free consultation, to note that payment isn’t required to create an attorney-client relationship.

“Given this legal precedent, courts have continuously held that any communication with an attorney falls under the attorney-client privilege if the communication was intended to be confidential and made for the purpose of securing legal advice,” he explained in a “Law & Crime” piece.

And despite Hannity’s contradiction, Hornsby said Cohen is held to that expectation.

University responds after Muslim professor cheers Barbara Bush’s death: ‘I’m happy the witch is dead’

“Unless Hannity formally authorizes Cohen to disclose their confidential communications,” he wrote. “Cohen has both a legal and ethical obligation to assert the attorney-client privilege on Hannity’s behalf and to protect all confidential information he possesses.”


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Tom Tillison


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles