“There is no clear evidence — even now,” he told the Post. “There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it.”
Even if all that is true, how would the CIA determine the Russian motivation for passing the information?
“You would think he would be better at putting by now. “
“This tactic is really unconscionable,” say the defeated Dems.
“I’ll put it like this: Clinton would almost certainly be President-elect if . . . “
“But I believe that intelligence has been politicized . . . “
Social media users were a little more convinced about what was behind the move…
It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.
So, now we are told the “Wascally Wussians” caused Clinton to lose? HA!
“…like potato chips; you can’t just watch one.”
“The fact of the matter is, the RNC was not hacked.”
The “war on Christmas” is expanding.