Congressman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) threatened Standford Univerisity in a blunt letter with subpoena enforcement for refusing to hand over information about how its Internet Observatory program “flags” so-called misinformation.

The letter was sent out on Thursday. Jordan in no uncertain terms informed Stanford’s legal team that the university provided “insufficient” compliance with an April subpoena for documents that are related to the Stanford Internet Observatory’s involvement in censoring “disfavored speech.”

The university has until June 14 to comply with Jordan’s demands, or the committee will “be forced to consider the use of one or more enforcement mechanisms.” The Daily Wire is reporting that these mechanisms could include “criminal contempt of Congress, civil enforcement, or ‘inherent contempt.’”

Republicans are hammering two projects from the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO program) that use the Jira Ticketing System to flag alleged misinformation. The program was founded in 2019 and the two projects that conservatives are shredding are the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) and the Virality Project (VP). Both of those projects were outed in parts 18 and 19 of the Twitter Files for working with the federal government to censor opinions as misinformation even if the information proved to be true. The projects dealt with voter fraud in the 2022 election and the COVID vaccine.

#BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan threatens contempt of the Stanford Internet Observatory pic.twitter.com/6FaqKjqDNZ

— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) June 1, 2023

The Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in the House Judiciary Committee wants answers regarding censorship on the social media platform. Jordan asserts that SIO knew about and helped implement that censorship.

“[I]ndividuals affiliated with SIO tracked both specific posts and entire ‘narratives’ through the Jira ticketing system and shared them, at a minimum, with large social media companies,” he remarked in the letter. “Public and non-public information obtained by the Committee confirms that large social media companies moderated content based upon these tickets and other information shared by Stanford personnel.”

Jordan said that his committee wants to see “all Jira tickets and related communications to social media companies, which document purportedly false content posted online.”

The Daily Wire goes on to report: “The chairman’s subpoena also demands communications between SIO and the Executive Branch related to content moderation dating back to January 2020 and documents about grants, contracts, and funds from the federal government dating back to January 2015.”

Restoring report that, per the Election Integrity Partnership’s own report, their work resulted in flagging of 22 million tweets.

They’re playing games with terms like “unique original URL,” where more than 1000 tweets can be “collpased” into one “incident”:@mehdirhasan pic.twitter.com/YSC13oSXUA

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) April 6, 2023

26. Perhaps the ultimate example of the absolute fusion of state, corporate, and civil society organizations is the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), whose “Election Integrity Partnership” is among the most voluminous “flaggers” in the #TwitterFiles: pic.twitter.com/wiSN9tl5Bl

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) March 9, 2023

37.From the start, Stanford explained the Virality Project would essentially continue the work of its 2020 Election Integrity Partnership. “The same JIRA system from the EIP is up and running,” they wrote. pic.twitter.com/kTgFYKGQuI

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) March 17, 2023

Jordan commented that the attorney representing Stanford, John Bellinger III of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, “confirmed” to committee staff in a recent call that the university does indeed have documents and communications related to the Jira tickets, but is refusing to produce them.

“You have represented that the basis for your refusal is that these documents and communications concern only a research project conducted by Stanford students,” Jordan wrote in the letter. “This description is inconsistent with information obtained by the Committee and available in the public domain, which suggests that the government and large social media platforms initiated and received information via these relevant documents.”

Michael Shellenberger, who reported on the groups for the Twitter Files, testified in front of the subcommittee accusing the Election Integrity Partnership of being the “seed of the censorship industrial complex.”

“They aren’t asking for a national debate over the limits of the First Amendment,” he scathingly contended. “Rather, they are creating blacklists of disfavored people and then pressuring, cajoling, and demanding that social media platforms censor, deamplify, and even ban the people on these blacklists.”

Shellenberger went on to charge that the Virality Project did the same thing concerning purported misinformation about COVID.

“[Virality Project] did the exact same kinds of censorship except focused on censoring COVID-19 information,” he claimed.

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

• Author
• Recent Posts

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

Staff Writer at BizPac Review

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton is a Constitutional Conservative who researches and writes extensively on politics and current events.

Latest posts by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton (see all)

• Walmart begins nixing self-checkouts and returning to ‘traditional’ lanes – here’s why - April 24, 2024
• ‘A real failure’: DeSantis slams Johnson, GOP House, says they ‘capitulated entirely on the border’ - April 24, 2024
• ‘Keep the John Boltons of the world outside’: Don Jr., Eric Trump take charge of transition team - April 24, 2024

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.