The New York Times’ obsession with racial grievance mongering has perhaps just reached its pinnacle, with the alleged paper of record running a whole story about horse-riding helmets not fitting the heads of black women with thick hair.
Titled “Black Equestrians Want to Be Safe. But They Can’t Find Helmets,” the piece published Friday complains about horse-riding being “a sport that remains overwhelmingly white.”
For Black equestrians with natural hair, finding a helmet that fits can be virtually impossible –– another barrier to inclusion in a sport that remains overwhelmingly white. Helmet companies say there isn’t a simple fix. https://t.co/hhYIBqZV8B pic.twitter.com/Io9myQ4wKJ
— The New York Times (@nytimes) March 3, 2023
“Chanel Robbins has been riding horses most of her life, ever since her grandmother traded a cow from their family’s farm in Ontario for a pony when she was 7. Galloping through the fields on her pony, Star, offered an escape from thoughts that weighed on her — that she didn’t have a relationship with her biological parents, for instance, or that she was the only Black girl in the neighborhood, aside from her sister,” the piece begins.
“About eight years ago, she reconnected with her father, a native of Jamaica. As the two grew closer, Ms. Robbins decided to style her hair in locs, like her dad. But there was a problem: Her riding helmet no longer fit, and she couldn’t find one that did,” it continues.
This seems like an understandable complaint, no? However, what Robbins had to say in her own words was less relatable.
“I finally freaking feel like myself, and now society is asking me to change. I just want to be able to ride,” she said.
In other words, she demands that the rest of the world change to appease her new hairdo — and for that, she’s now receiving front-page treatment:
Front page story in @nytimes today is some black women with dreadlocks can’t find horse riding helmets that fit well. Front page! I mean, NYT is really working hard to win the oppression Olympics here. The picture here is amazing. Like she just finished the trail of tears pic.twitter.com/06HoL1T4Hu
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) March 4, 2023
But Robbins isn’t the only one.
“Black equestrians have long felt virtually invisible in a sport that remains overwhelmingly white. For those with natural hair, which for many is a declaration of pride and Black identity, finding a helmet that fits properly can be nearly impossible, creating yet another barrier to full inclusion. Some are now lobbying for change, mindful that horseback riding is among the leading causes of sports-related traumatic brain injury,” the Times piece notes.
Critics have some issues. They say that while the desire by black equestrians to protect their heads with a helmet is completely understandable, their unwillingness to make the compromises and sacrifices needed to do so is not.
Note that even The New York Times’ own liberal readers feel this way, as evidenced by the top-voted comments on the Times’ piece.
“If you play a sport that requires your body is a particular shape – whether that’s weight for football, height for basketball, a minimal hair style for riding, or shaving body hair for swimmers – you do it,” the top-voted comment with 800+ recommendations reads.
“Demanding that things be changed because you prefer a particular look is entitled and unrealistic. I imagine the helmet manufacturers will give the correct responses and do nothing,” it continues.
As for horse-riding helmet manufacturers, they’re aware of the problem and interested in working on it but argue that it’s not an easy fix.
“If it’s truly a manufacturing problem, anything is possible, but we’re talking years of development,” Laura Qusen, the chief operating officer at Tipperary Equestrian, explained to the Times.
She added that there’s also the risk of investing so much money in developing a new helmet with new safety standards for such a niche market (of thick-haired black women who refuse to simply cut their hair).
This pragmatic response reportedly deeply upset Robbins.
“The exchange with Ms. Qusen left Ms. Robbins in tears. She wondered if it was time to find a new sport, one that would make her feel like she mattered,” the Times reported.
Much like Times’ readers, most Twitter users were not very sympathetic to her plight, nor to the Times’ race-baiting framing of the issue.
i’m too short to play basketball
basketball is racist
— Shibetoshi Nakamoto (@BillyM2k) March 4, 2023
If your hair prevents you from wearing proper safety equipment, then you do what everyone else does: cut it.✂️
— Commander Tano (@LadyTano501st) March 3, 2023
How does she think they could make a helmet that could properly protect your entire head AND accommodate large masses of hair? Even if they could how would they do it as anything but a custom job as the market for such a product isn’t there.
— NeoUnrealist (@NeoUnrealist) March 3, 2023
Well, maybe that’s an opportunity for the young lady to start a business for all those natural hair black horse riders. But nooo out here complaining about diversity and inclusion. 3D print a helmet, get some backing, and make something happen.
— No-Life King (@JaimeKing1989) March 3, 2023
For a helmet to fit properly and offer protection it has to be TIGHT and Big Hair prevents this.
I imagine Marie Antoinette and the Ladies of Versailles with their huge hairdos might have a similar problem.
— wyntre (@Wyntre999) March 3, 2023
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- AP dragged for masking immigration status of illegal alien charged in death of Georgia nursing student - February 25, 2024
- NYC subway rider who was victim of random acid attack says city should not be emptying jails - February 25, 2024
- INSIDER: Mysterious high-altitude balloon spotted over US dismissed as ‘hobby’ craft - February 25, 2024
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.