American Federation of Teachers (AFT) President Randi Weingarten railed against challenges to President Joe Biden’s student loan cancellation plan outside of the Supreme Court Tuesday as oral arguments began for two cases that could put the proposal on ice, video shows.
Students, politicians and activists rallied outside the Supreme Court late Monday night and throughout Tuesday as the high bench heard arguments for two cases that will determine whether or not the Biden Administration’s plan to cancel an estimated $400 billion in student loans is constitutional. Weingarten said it is “not right” that student loan lenders and corporations oppose canceling student loans when many businesses received aid during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“And frankly, and this is what really pisses me off, during the pandemic we understood that small businesses were hurting and we helped them, and it didn’t go to the Supreme Court to challenge it,” Weingarten said, according to a video posted by Jake Schneider. “Big businesses were hurting and we helped them, and it didn’t go to the Supreme Court to challenge it.”
Randi Weingarten — union cartel boss and Democrats’ biggest campaign donor — melts down on the steps of the Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/9RTbxVxQEL
— Jake Schneider (@jacobkschneider) February 28, 2023
The Biden Administration attempted to use the 2003 Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act which permits the Department of Education (DOE) to eliminate debt during a national emergency, according to the Associated Press. Former President Donald Trump issued a national emergency during the COVID-19 pandemic which will end on May 11, but the Biden administration maintains that student loan borrowers will still be impacted.
“All of a sudden, when it’s about our students, they challenge it. The corporations challenge it. The student loan lenders challenge it,” Weingarten continued, according to the video. “That is not right. That is not fair and that is what we are fighting, as well, when we say cancel student debt.”
Jack Fitzhenry, senior legal policy analyst at Heritage Foundation, told the Daily Caller News Foundation on Monday that the HEROES Act “doesn’t provide the authority that the administration claims it does.”
“I expect the argument will center on whether Congress clearly gave the President the power to unilaterally wipe away half a trillion dollars in student loan debt in the HEROES Act,” Michael Poon, a Pacific Legal Foundation attorney, previously told the DCNF.
The court heard arguments for Biden v. Nebraska, which was brought by a coalition of states that allege the department overstepped its statutory authority, and Department of Education v. Brown, which was filed by two student loan borrowers.
The administration’s plan would cancel $20,000 of debt for borrowers who received Pell grants and $10,000 for borrowers who did not.
ATF did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Joe Manchin asks donors to pump $100 million into his daughter’s dark money group: Report - August 30, 2023
- Hunter Biden’s claims in court about a massive Chinese payment don’t quite add up - July 31, 2023
- Colleges move to arm officers in response to inner-city crime after previous calls to defund the police - May 28, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.