- The Air Force’s updated discharge policy contains a discrepancy with Department of Defense policy, a government watchdog found in a report Thursday.
- Air Force officials may have allowed underqualified personnel to make decisions on whether to characterize a servicemember’s discharge as honorable or dishonorable.
- The conflicting policy may have affected airmen discharged over the COVID-19 mandate.
The Air Force failed to comply with the Department of Defense’s (DOD) standards for deciding whether to characterize dischargers as honorable or dishonorable, a government watchdog found.
DOD policy requires superior officers, with a rating of E-7 or higher, to review individual cases and make a final decision on discharging a service member under honorable, neutral or dishonorable conditions, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a Thursday report. However, the Air Force allowed junior noncommissioned officers to participate in those decisions, potentially affecting airmen discharged over the COVID-19 mandate.
“Provisions in the Air Force’s policy for noncommissioned officer board member qualifications conflict and one is inconsistent with DOD policy, which may lead to differing implementation of board processes,” GAO said.
“Being separated from the armed forces for misconduct, unsatisfactory performance, or other reasons can have lifelong implications,” to include being denied veterans’ education and health care benefits and future employment, GAO wrote.
When a member of the military faces discharge, the member can request the service convene an “administrative separation board” to review the member’s case, according to GAO. The separation board makes the call whether to characterize the conditions surrounding the member’s departure from the military as “honorable,” “general (under honorable conditions)” or “other than honorable.”
The discrepancy could include members of the Air Force who refused the COVID-19 vaccine and were progressing through the discharge process between June 24, when the Air Force last updated its policy, and July 27, when a district judge blocked the Air Force from removing servicemembers for vaccine-related reasons.
The Air Force discharged 162 airmen between June 27 and July 11, department fact sheets show. In April, Air Force personnel leaders said roughly 70% of unvaccinated airmen received general discharges, MilitaryTimes reported.
The Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Space Force issue similar guidance regarding the process for creating separation boards, including determining who sits on the board, GAO said. While most of the policies are consistent with DOD policy and any relevant legislation, one provision in the Air Force’s policy diverged from overarching DOD rules.
The DOD rule, dated Jan. 27, 2014, and last updated on June 23, 2022, requires that any noncommissioned officer appointed to a serve as a voting member on a separation board hold an E-7, equivalent to a master sergeant, or higher rank.
However, the Air Force’s version of the policy, last updated June 24, contains two conflicting rules, GAO found. One rule mandates that any noncommissioned officer may serve on the board as long as the office outranks the servicemember facing discharge, and another says the officer must rank at an E-7 or higher.
A guide for separating enlisted airmen the latest policy superseded does not appear to contain conflicting instructions.
Air Force officials told GAO the discrepancy “may have been an oversight made” during the revision process in 2022.
Until the discrepancy is resolved, “the Air Force risks having board results overturned if voting members are not appointed in a manner that is consistent with the grade requirements specified in DOD policy,” GAO said.
Armed forces conduct legal reviews of each separation decision, representatives told GAO, and discharged servicemembers still have the right to request a post-separation inquiry.
DOD did not provide GAO with a comment. The Air Force did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- US reportedly prepping massive weapons package to fast-track to Ukraine after Congress approves aid - April 22, 2024
- Military could hit troops with court-martials for refusing to use preferred pronouns, experts say - April 21, 2024
- Secretary of State Blinken says US was not involved in Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran - April 19, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
