‘There are no facts that can excuse this violation’: Schiff slapped with ethics complaint

U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff is having a rough week, and if it weren’t so delicious to watch, we might even feel a bit bad for him.

Think about it.

On Tuesday, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tossed his fellow Californian off the Intelligence Committee.

When he cried about it on TikTok, he was mercilessly mocked, which had to sting.

But not as bad as the reaction he got on Thursday when he announced with a cringy ad that he was running for Senate.

While Schiff may think Californians who are suffering under ridiculously high gas prices and even more ridiculous egg prices while they grapple with flooding and loss want to hear about how much he despises former President Donald Trump, social media had other brutal thoughts.


And now his “Orange Man Bad” obsession has gotten Adam Schiff in hot water with an ethics watchdog group.

Just one day after Schiff slammed Republicans for caring “more about power than anything else,” the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) fired off a complaint to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) asking for an investigation into his use of footage from the Senate floor in his ad — a potential abuse of “official resources for political purposes.”

“The law is clear and the image above speaks for itself—there are no facts that can excuse this violation,” the complaint, signed by FACT Executive Director Kendra Arnold, states.

“This is a clear violation of House ethics rules and federal law,” Arnold said, according to Fox News Digital. “Rep. Schiff has been in Congress for over two decades and undoubtedly knows that official government resources cannot be used for political purposes.”

“Rep. Schiff must immediately take down the video and cease distribution of the footage, and the Office of Congressional Ethics should move swiftly to investigate and sanction Rep. Schiff for this breach,” she demanded.

Naturally, Schiff’s campaign did mental backflips to dismiss the violation.

He didn’t violate any ethics rules, you see, because, although he is a member of the House — and using him speaking from that floor would totally be a no-no — he was speaking from the Senate when he was ranting about Trump, so that’s totally okay.

“House ethics rules prohibit the use of House floor or committee footage for campaign purposes — the rules do not apply to footage from the Senate, which is what was used in Congressman Schiff’s video,” a campaign spokesperson told Fox News Digital. “No footage from any House proceeding was used in the video, and Congressman Schiff was fully in compliance with House ethics guidelines.”

Like much of what comes from Schiff, that doesn’t appear to be true.

“Federal law states that ‘appropriations shall be applied only to the objects for which the appropriations were made except as otherwise provided by law,'” FACT’s complaint states. “To enforce this law, the ethics rules prohibit Members from using any official resource for campaign or political purposes.”

“‘Official resources’ includes anything funded by taxpayers, such as a Member’s official website, social media accounts, and photographs and video from the House or Senate floor,” the organization explains. “To make it abundantly clear, both the House ethics rules and Senate rules specifically identify Congressional video of floor proceedings as official resources that Members are prohibited from using for political purposes.”

On Twitter, journalist Niels Lesniewski suggested Schiff might be in the clear because the video he used came from NBC.

“Could be ok,” he tweeted. “He’s not a senator, and it looks like they used NBC TV footage of the floor, which is a common workaround.”

But FACT hit back.

“Respectfully, there is no ‘workaround,'” they replied. “In 2017, the Ethics Committee in In Re: Lujan reiterated the rule and stated, ‘Members may not re-use an image of a floor proceeding published by a third-party, if the Member could not use that image in the first instance.'”

 

And, indeed, the organization is correct.

In Rep. Lugen’s final report, the Ethics Committee also stated, “the Committee’s guidance has made clear that such a derivative use is not permissible.”

“This is an important rule because it not only protects taxpayer-funded resources from abuse, but it also protects the integrity of official proceedings by reducing the incentive for members to make political speeches during official proceedings,” FACT’s complaint reads. “One issue the House Ethics Manual acknowledges is the public perception that incumbents are simply using their office to run for re-election or to run for a higher office, and the reason for that perception is quite evident in Rep. Schiff’s actions. Moreover, his use of official resources does not reflect credibly on the House.”

Well, at least no one is calling him “Pencil Neck” anymore.

Oh, wait…

 

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Melissa Fine

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles