Twitter owner Elon Musk released the second part of the “Twitter Files” Thursday evening, and with its release came a bevy of new bombshell revelations, the largest one being that “[t]he inmates were running the asylum.”
Which is to say that the social media platform was being run by censorious leftists who had no qualms about arbitrarily shadow-banning or outright banning conservatives based on questionable rules that were unevenly enforced.
However, former Twitter boss Jack Dorsey was not necessarily part of this madness, according to Musk, who suggested in a tweet that this ideologically driven censorship was driven by lower-level employees who’d purposefully kept Dorsey out of the loop:
Controversial decisions were often made without getting Jack’s approval and he was unaware of systemic bias. The inmates were running the asylum.
Jack has a pure heart imo.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
True, some accounts on the right were suspended even when Twitter internally acknowledged that no rules were broken
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
Employees like Yoel Roth, the former global head of trust and safety, and Vijaya Gadde, the former head of legal, policy, and trust.
The pair worked with other employees to “build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics—all in secret, without informing users,” according to journalist Bari Weiss.
Weiss was the journalist chosen to release the second batch of the “Twitter Files.”
1. A new #TwitterFiles investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics—all in secret, without informing users.
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
As @bariweiss clearly describes, the rules were enforced against the right, but not against the left
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
In a tweet, Musk suggested that Roth’s censorious behavior wasn’t necessarily all that surprising given his history as a histrionic leftist.
As an example, the Twitter CEO shared screenshots of hyperventilating tweets Roth had posted in 2017 in which he’d essentially accused the then-Trump administration of being stockpiled with “actual Nazis.”
FYI, there were no “Nazis” in the Trump administration.
Former head of censorship at Twitter was perhaps not entirely unbiased … pic.twitter.com/yynb9whc5S
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
While the censorious behavior was predictable, it was also contradictory to what employees like Gadde had claimed publicly.
“We do not shadow ban. And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology,” Gadde reportedly said in 2018.
But that was clearly a lie.
6. Twitter denied that it does such things. In 2018, Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde (then Head of Legal Policy and Trust) and Kayvon Beykpour (Head of Product) said: “We do not shadow ban.” They added: “And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.”
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
However, she and other employees seemed to justify their censorious behavior by referring to it as something else: “visibility filtering.”
“What many people call ‘shadow banning,’ Twitter executives and employees call ‘Visibility Filtering’ or ‘VF,'” Weiss explained in a tweet.
But while its official name may have been different, the core tenets were the same:
7. What many people call “shadow banning,” Twitter executives and employees call “Visibility Filtering” or “VF.” Multiple high-level sources confirmed its meaning.
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
8. “Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool,” one senior Twitter employee told us.
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
9. “VF” refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limit the scope of a particular tweet’s discoverability; to block select users’ posts from ever appearing on the “trending” page; and from inclusion in hashtag searches.
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
10. All without users’ knowledge.
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
Note the key words at the bottom: “All without users’ knowledge.”
Musk is hoping to rectify this abuse by tweaking Twitter’s software code to make it so that users can see their “true account status” at any time.
“Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status, so you know clearly if you’ve been shadowbanned, the reason why and how to appeal,” he tweeted late Thursday.
Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status, so you know clearly if you’ve been shadowbanned, the reason why and how to appeal
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
One of the victims of Twitter’s censorship was Chaya Raichik, the woman behind the famous “Libs of TikTok” Twitter account.
Weiss reported that Raichik was repeatedly suspended for violating Twitter’s policy against “hateful conduct” despite her Twitter content not actually violating the rules.
Conversely, when Raichik reported a leftist user for publishing her address (called doxxing) to the platform, the leftist wasn’t penalized, let alone suspended.
18. Twitter repeatedly informed Raichik that she had been suspended for violating Twitter’s policy against “hateful conduct.”
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
19. But in an internal SIP-PES memo from October 2022, after her seventh suspension, the committee acknowledged that “LTT has not directly engaged in behavior violative of the Hateful Conduct policy.” See here: pic.twitter.com/d9FGhrnQFE
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
20. The committee justified her suspensions internally by claiming her posts encouraged online harassment of “hospitals and medical providers” by insinuating “that gender-affirming healthcare is equivalent to child abuse or grooming.”
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
22. When Raichik told Twitter that her address had been disseminated she says Twitter Support responded with this message: “We reviewed the reported content, and didn’t find it to be in violation of the Twitter rules.” No action was taken. The doxxing tweet is still up. pic.twitter.com/tUeaBP1bS4
— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
Republished with permission from American Wire News Service
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Trans HS student arrested after disturbing manifesto comes to light: ‘This gun is going to change lives tomorrow’ - April 20, 2024
- Former Letitia James intern among those arrested at anti-Israel protest: report - April 20, 2024
- ATF agents not wearing bodycams during shootout with Clinton airport executive director, Republicans demand answers - April 20, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!