Massachusetts voters will have a chance to repeal a law allowing illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses.
The bill was vetoed in May by Republican Governor Charlie Baker. But in another case of ruling against the will of the people, the veto didn’t stick. So strongly do Democrats in the state legislature feel about illegals voting that they went all in and overrode the veto.
Nevertheless, the people will have the final say, as the ballot measure’s approval was announced on Friday.
“It just shows how out of touch the Democratic Legislature is with the will of the people,” Massachusetts GOP chairman Jim Lyons told the Boston Herald. “We will absolutely win. A poll had us winning 51 percent to 37 percent.”
According to the Herald story, the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office certified 71,883 signatures and confirmed that the repeal measure was eligible for November’s ballot in the state. The required number of signatures is 40,120.
With 71,883 signatures submitted & allowed, the Elections Division has certified that a referendum question on “An Act Relative to Work & Family Mobility” will appear as Question #4 on the November State Election ballot.
40,120 signatures were required for certification.
— Mass. Elections (@VotingInMass) September 9, 2022
The law, which would go into effect in July 2023, has one of those newfangled names that looks like lipstick on a pig: the “Work and Family Mobility Act.” What wonderfully positive words – surely it polled well. Its provisions are another matter entirely.
The law allows residents who do “not provide proof of lawful presence in the United States” to provide a valid, unexpired foreign passport and another piece of documentation, such as a birth certificate or foreign national identification card, to get a Massachusetts driver’s license.
In passing the law, Massachusetts joined 16 other states that have similar laws in force. If voters don’t strike it down, it will go into effect next July.
Maureen Maloney has led the repeal effort. Her son, Matthew, died in 2011, having been killed in a crash with an illegal alien. In June, Maloney formed a committee to repeal the law and filed a statement of organization with the Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance.
“I do not think that we should be rewarding people for being in the country illegally,” Maloney told the Federation for American Immigration Reform. “I think the RMV [Registry of Motor Vehicles] is not equipped to properly vet people coming into the United States from over 100 different countries and being able to reliably decipher their documentation that, first of all, is in the different language, and second of all, for validity.”
Incredibly, there are those who boldly proclaim the validity of the law Maloney seeks to repeal.
Sarang Sekhavat, the political director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition who advocated for the measure, explained in an interview with WBUR that there are illegal immigrants driving in Massachusetts. Therefore, she reasoned, “Ensuring all Massachusetts drivers meet the necessary identification, registration and testing requirements for driving just simply makes the roads safer.”
Jim Lyons disagreed, saying that driving is a privilege, not a right.
“The rule of law matters,” Lyons said. “People that are in the country illegally should not be rewarded for their behavior by getting a driver’s license.”
The MS state legislature’s veto override in May was a thumbing of the nose at voters. It is the kind of chutzpah seemingly only displayed in deep blue states. Most Representatives do not feel threatened by Republicans running against them. Their seats are safe. Blue states keep electing their Democrats and complaining about the mess their state is in. It’s almost as though they have lost all ability to deduce.
Issue by issue, though, voters are less progressive than their “representatives,” which is the power of ballot measures. Such measures have the effect of bailing citizens out from the consequences of their voting habits.
Nice anybody know how this topic polls generally in Massachusetts? Definitely supporting it. Who wants a car crash with the other driver not able to be insured? Not me. Seems basic if people understand it. But the Howie cow’s of the world
— The Young Jurks (@TheYoungJurks) September 9, 2022
Charlie Baker announced last December that he would not seek a third term as governor of Massachusetts.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- GOP senator calls for Biden’s non-binary nuclear guru to be terminated following humiliating arrest - December 1, 2022
- Peter Doocy asks puzzled KJP when the White House will delete its Twitter account - December 1, 2022
- Whole Foods cites environmental concerns, alleged threat to endangered whales to end lobster sales - November 28, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
