Judge tosses lawsuit accusing Mississippi of discriminatory proof-of-citizenship requirement

A federal judge officially nixed a lawsuit on Tuesday that accused the state of Mississippi of using an allegedly discriminatory proof-of-citizenship requirement for voters under a law that goes all the way back to the Jim Crow era.

The dismissal of the lawsuit comes just weeks after the state repealed a 1924 law that required naturalized citizens to provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote.

A new law has taken the place of the repealed one and although voting rights groups aren’t thrilled over it, they are tentatively accepting it because it should protect naturalized citizens from being flagged as noncitizens when they register to vote.

According to the Associated Press, the secretary of state in Mississippi has been running names of potential new voters through a state Department of Public Safety database of people with Mississippi driver’s licenses and identification cards. Voting rights advocates have called foul over the practice, claiming that it disproportionately hurts people of color, tagging them as possible noncitizens.

Per the new legislation, if the public safety database queries a person’s citizenship, the potential new voter’s name has to go through a federal immigration database.

“We would prefer that there be no database matching,” Rob McDuff, who is an attorney for the Mississippi Center for Justice said in a news release on Tuesday. “There is no problem in Mississippi with non-citizens trying to vote. But given that the secretary of state created such a database matching program, (the new law) makes the situation better and decreases the number of erroneous non-matches.”

Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and the Mississippi Center for Justice both sued the state in 2019 on behalf of the Mississippi Immigrants Rights Alliance and the League of Women Voters of Mississippi.

“No state in the United States other than Mississippi subjects naturalized citizens to a higher proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration than U.S.-born citizens,” the lawsuit contended.

Both the plaintiffs and the defendants asked U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves to dismiss the suit on Tuesday. That also included the secretary of state’s office. The judge granted the request and negated the suit.

Republican Gov. Tate Reeves signed House Bill 1510 into law on April 14. He asserted that it “ensures that only American citizens are able to vote in Mississippi.”

“There will be those on the left who will claim that we are making it harder for American citizens to vote,” the governor declared. “Those claims are false.”

“Their patriotism deserves to be honored, not punished,” Ezra Rosenberg of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law said. “The addition of this new safeguard will help prevent naturalized citizens from being erroneously blocked from registering to vote through no fault of their own.”

House Bill 1510 passed the Mississippi House 114-5 with broad bipartisan support. It then passed in the Senate 38-13 where most Democrats opposed it.

Reeves slammed New York City when he signed the law. The Big Apple enacted a law in January that allows non-citizens to vote in its municipal elections but not in state or federal elections.

The governor accused “radical activists” of pushing open the ballot box to approximately 800,000 non-citizens.

Since then, over a dozen communities across the country have allowed noncitizens to vote in local elections. Those include two towns in Vermont and 11 in Maryland.

“We’re not going to allow liberals, whether they’re in New York or Washington, DC, to tell us how to run our local elections,” the governor proclaimed.

The new law asserts that a person whose citizenship status is in question has 30 days to prove they are a citizen with a birth certificate, a U.S. passport, or naturalization documents. If they fail to do so, their name will be marked “pending” in the Statewide Elections Management System until the next federal general election.

The voter could cast a provisional ballot during the federal election but would have to prove citizenship within five days for their vote to count. If the person does not vote in the federal election, their name would be marked “rejected” in the Statewide Elections Management System.

Vangela M. Wade, who is the president and CEO of the Mississippi Center For Justice, said in a statement on Tuesday that “we have a long way to go to fully protect Mississippians’ democratic rights.”

“Today, many Mississippians, particularly people of color, face enormous hurdles to access the ballot box,” she disingenuously claimed. “We must continue removing barriers to voting and make access the standard, not the exception.”

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

9 thoughts on “Judge tosses lawsuit accusing Mississippi of discriminatory proof-of-citizenship requirement

  1. I would say this site is fairly conservative so I cringe when I see a conservative writer using terms defined by the left, In this case the term is “Voting Rights advocates” That is a very noble sounding title for people wanting to eliminate identification requirements, and expand voting systems such as mail in voting
    (not absentee voting) basically anything that makes voting less secure. That is the lefts definition of voting rights.

    Along the same lines are terms like “Gun Violence” Guns are inanimate objects incapable of violence. People are violent.
    Then there is the term “Assault weapon, weapon of war” Trying to give a meaningful explanation of why both terms are inaccurate is pissing in the wind.
    They are terms to invoke a mental image, when you control the words you control the argument.

  2. This federal judge got it right. I imagine that the commucrat’s lawyers are already working on their appeal.

    Nothing is ever final with them.

  3. The idea that people of color have difficulty obtaining the proper documentation to vote is, has always been, and always will be one of the stupidest and most baseless arguments the DemoKKKrats have advanced for any issue I can think of. And claiming that people of color are not smart enough to comply with the law is a CLEARLY racist notion.

  4. I don’t get why it’s so hard for people to understand how important it is to have proper documentation as a citizen or legal immigrant in this country. State ID or license is all we should need to verify our rights to vote. It’s the same documentation that has to be presented to the police if you are stopped for whatever reason. If you are here legally but not a US Citizen then you should have a green card. It’s sad that we have to spend tax money unnecessarily due to voting corruption. Let these thick-headed people go to another country illegally and try to vote or consume government resources. Then let’s see how they feel about that government when picked up and prosecuted.

  5. For the left, there is no sanctity of life (but sanctity of the leftist SELF) therefore no Ethics and their laws apply to everyone but themselves.

  6. The only reason they let non-citizens to vote locally is then when they vote nationally and state wise it will be harder to figure out they aren’t supposed to! Democrats are always trying to figure out more ways of cheating because they can’t win fairly!

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles