If Roe is overturned, Americans will have to answer an essential question

By Ilan Srulovicz, DCNF

What is a human life?

The intense conflict taking place right now over Roe v. Wade demonstrates a key ideological fracture in our country. The fundamental dividing point on this issue is whether a human being, by nature of existing and being conceived, has value, or even a right to life.

The court’s justification in Roe v. Wade attempted to deny the right to life based on the argument based on privacy and viability, the latter being further expanded in Planned Parenthood v Casey. According to these supreme court’s decisions, if a fetus is not yet a person and just a “potential life” and the woman decides to destroy it, then the state does not have a right to infringe on her right as it is a private matter.

Yet science has now proven time and again that standard is inconsistent.

For example, viability, which at the time of the Roe decision was 26 weeks has since improved dramatically. Were those unborn babies aborted in past decades not considered “people” simply because technology hadn’t yet caught up?

To be clear, scientific advances show that there is no biological basis to refer to a fetus merely as a “potential life”. Even some pro-abortion advocates no longer argue that a fetus is just a developing human life. The dispute is whether that life is deemed worthy of living. 

Indeed, the arguments for a denial of a right to life are based on development and dependency/viability — but these positions don’t hold up when questioned, even superficially. We do not kill people because they are currently in an earlier stage of development, such as a baby, and we do not remove people’s right to life because they are dependent on others.

But this attempt to qualify which humans deserve life is ambiguous by intent.

This philosophy to set inconsistent standards for what qualifies as a person has consistently resulted in atrocities throughout history. If the human being does not have a right to life, for just being alive, then any standard set can, and will, be abused.

The need to redefine human value in this way always comes down to a starting position that is malicious by nature. Slavery was a very convenient position for white people wanting free labor, yet if all people were indeed created equally then the justification for slavery fell apart. The same can be said about Hitler’s tactics, who could not have committed his atrocities if the value of a human being was consistent.

In the decades since Roe v. Wade, these arguments around abortion have been largely philosophical and personal for Americans. But if Roe is overturned, the question of whose life ultimately holds value will be returned to the states, and everyday people. Indeed, everyone from the modern-day social justice warrior, to the stay-at-home mom, to the retired grandparent will suddenly have a say in the issue.

Who gets to decide what human life has value? Is the right to life a universal absolute, or is it morally relative? Should we be able to look at a human being and say their life doesn’t matter because 50 years ago they wouldn’t have been able to survive on their own outside the womb?

History has shown what atrocities can result when cultures answer these questions wrongly — if one life can cease to matter then any life can cease to matter. As Americans these questions may soon be upon us, and we would be wise to consider the answers carefully.

For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

2 thoughts on “If Roe is overturned, Americans will have to answer an essential question

  1. In the decision of Roe v Wade, it was mentioned that SCOTUS could not deny Roe an abortion because: SCOTUS did NOT have a proven definition of “when life begins”. This was included to leave the door open to reversing Roe v Wade when science finally determined when life begins. Well, life begins at conception! This is the Biblical view and was the accepted view up until the Roe v Wade case was argued. Every day science gets closer and closer to accepting that “life begins at conception”. A baby’s heartbeat, separate from the mother’s, can be heard at 15 weeks. But, that fertilized egg already has its own DNA and is decidedly NOT just a bundle of indiscriminate cells. It is a living human being and NOT part of the mother’s body.
    Abortion is murder of our most vulnerable citizens.
    If you do not want a child, do NOT get pregnant. It is very easy to prevent pregnancy. It is the lazy and irresponsible who rely on abortion to “fix” their negligence.

  2. Let’s be clear about one thing. Roe vs Wade was never about whether or not a child conceived was a viable life. Because the Bible has already spoken on that subject. No this entire subject is whether or not one believes in God. So make no mistake those who murder their infants at ANY STAGE are Godless. They have CHOSEN to ignore the laws of the Bible. The laws God has given to man to live by. And there are no laws of man that will shield them from God’s retribution on judgement day.

    Romans 1:18-32: the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, …

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles