The New York Times took heat from all sides after dropping an opinion piece on Thursday that advocated for Ukraine to hand over its sovereignty on a silver platter to Russia because the war is “getting complicated, and America isn’t ready.”
Fox News host Laura Ingraham was one of the very few people who responded in support of the editorial board’s position that it’s “still not in America’s best interest to plunge into an all-out war with Russia, even if a negotiated peace may require Ukraine to make some hard decisions.”
“Even the @nytimes realizes that we’re getting in too deep in Ukraine,” Ingraham tweeted Thursday afternoon.
However, not everyone was as pleased with the Times’ editorial team who declared that “A decisive military victory for Ukraine over Russia, in which Ukraine regains all the territory Russia has seized since 2014, is not a realistic goal.”
“Though Russia’s planning and fighting have been surprisingly sloppy, Russia remains too strong, and Mr. Putin has invested too much personal prestige in the invasion to back down,” they argued.
Worst editorial take ever from the NYT. Whose idea was this thought salad?
— Susan Murphy (@susmurphy) May 20, 2022
“In the end, it is the Ukrainians who must make the hard decisions: They are the ones fighting, dying and losing their homes to Russian aggression, and it is they who must decide what an end to the war might look like,” the writers noted, adding, “If the conflict does lead to real negotiations, it will be Ukrainian leaders who will have to make the painful territorial decisions that any compromise will demand.”
As if anticipating the sharp critics that they seemed to know would blast their solution as “appeasement,” they assured readers that’s not really what they were suggesting.
“Confronting this reality may be painful, but it is not appeasement. This is what governments are duty bound to do, not chase after an illusory ‘win,'” they wrote.
But journalist and author Andrea Chalupa called them out for their take and slammed the board’s argument as “nonsense.”
“If the @nytimes Editorial Board has to insist its argument for Ukraine giving up territory to Russia ‘is not appeasement’ then it’s appeasement. This is Walter Duranty level nonsense. No wonder they still count his award among their Pulitzers,” she wrote on social media.
The absurdity she seemed to be referring to was a recent report that indicated Duranty played a role through his “woefully misleading journalism” to attempt to cover up genocide in the Soviet Union.
Did A Prize-Winning reporter for the New York Times help cover up a genocide? https://t.co/XzGAqbQBYT
— American Wire News (@americanwire_) March 17, 2022
Benjamin Wittes, Editor in Chief for Lawfare chimed in on the proposed appeasement tactic, writing that “The New York Times editorial page endorses pressuring Ukraine to cede territory to Russia.
“Really shameful, guys,” he added.
A senior writer and former editor for the Jewish Chronicle was even more critical of the opinion.
“I used to think the main characteristic of @nytimes editorials was their pomposity,” Stephen Pollard wrote. “I see they’ve now added craven appeasement and contempt for freedom.”
Many others criticized the writers’ proposed approach to the war in Ukraine that the U.S. Congress recently approved an additional $40 billion in funding to support.
It’s not complicated, but it will be tricky to execute and that is the reason for maintaining flexibility. US is clear. Provide Ukraine with all the material support available while avoiding a wider war.
— Rick Wattling 🇨🇦 🇺🇦 (@rwattling) May 20, 2022
Thank you for your opinion. Thank you for expressing it so that readers around the world may see it. Thank you for providing Americans with a reminder of the 1930s approach of appeasement towards authoritarian regimes. It worked well then, I’m certain it’d work just as well now.
— B. Ivy Stiles USMC, CU go Buffs!, Classics, Latin (@ivy_istiles) May 20, 2022
This is tremendously disappointing. You’ve missed the bigger picture altogether, arguing that aggression should be rewarded and Ukraine should accept being carved into pieces and missing the heart of it–that standing against tyrants in support of democracy is a necessary act.
— Shelby Edwards (@STEWest) May 20, 2022
Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Watch: Suspect hits unsuspecting NYC man in back of the head with a baseball bat – in broad daylight - December 4, 2022
- Uber-hawk John Bolton says Trump’s ‘act is old and tired now,’ calls for ‘next generation’ of Republicans - November 27, 2022
- ‘Big yikes!’ SNL cold open mocking Biden and Dems over midterms painfully unfunny - November 6, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
10 thoughts on “‘Craven appeasement’: NYT editorial sparks debate by suggesting Ukraine cede territory to end war”
Comments are closed.
What do they care. Its not their homes and towns being blown apart. Its not their children dead in a rubble of buildings. They sit back on their high and mighty laurels like they think their the kings of the world. Its high time that the Times looks to see what time it is. Gutless cowards just like Bite-on. Lead from behind where its nice and safe cowards. They all deserve a big loogie in the face. Preferably some one who has pneumonia. Someone with green snot on their upper lip.
To the victor goes the spoils. Lets see Ukraine continue to fight for their country and not give Russia the victory. But I bet the NYT doesn’t feel the same about the colonists winning the war with the Indeginous people here and to those victors went the spoils ,it was not stolen.
I agree with the NYT
Im against anything the Times is for, and Im for anything they are against. Plain and simple. Dont even care that much for New Yorkers either. Excluding Trump, they could burn that city to the ground and I wouldnt care the least.
I’m so tired of all the Politicians waving Ukrainian flags and shouting “We must stand for Democracy” and proclaiming Zelenskyy a populist “hero” when he is, in fact, just another dictator and corrupt politician. We can sympathize/support the Ukrainian people but will we start WWIII over it? Should we start WWIII over the genocide of the Uyghurs in China? We don’t seem to care about the systematic genocide of Christians in Iran, in Afghanistan, in Nigeria and other parts of Africa? And, oh yeah, Ukraine is the corrupt government that took a Billion dollar bribe from Joe Biden to fire the prosecutor that was looking into his son Hunter’s money laundering scheme. Not to mention that these Republicans are complicit in the constant money printing of this administration that is the primary cause of the massive inflation that’s bankrupting our country and our citizens. We send them 40 Billion dollars which is 8 times the amount that a wall on our southern border (to protect our “sovereignty and territorial integrity”) would have cost and they refused.
Remember that Putin took Crimea in 2014 when Obama was President and nobody was calling for war then? If fact, Obama refused to send them weapons and instead sent blankets. Why is it so important now? It a distraction from the destruction going on in our own country and the Democrats want the war to continue until after the November elections.
Not to mention, protecting another country’s border & doing NOTHING about OUR southern border’s INVASION.
WHY does BPR allow these SPAMMERS to keep posting their ill gotten money? NOBODY cares how much $$$$$$$$ they make. IF they really did make what they claim, they’d keep their mouths shut!!!
I’m just about ready to unsubscribe.
I just wonder were more than Hunter and Joe on the Ukraine money bribing payroll? Why else are we committing money we don’t have, supplies we are short of into a country that is most likely only going to achieve a draw?
Ok, NY Times, how about if Ukraine cedes some of its territory when your rag cedes control of your editorial section to America First conservatives? A fair tit for tat?