The pro-abortion set isn’t very happy with Nancy Pelosi these days.
This is apparently why a small group of pro-choice picketers showed up in front of House Speaker Pelosi’s home in San Francisco, carrying elaborate placards with the faces of the five offending Supreme Court justices who are likely to be responsible for the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Armed with bullhorns and an inordinate amount of anger, they condemned Pelosi and all other Democrats as being a party to the abortion law’s demise.
“We are here because the Democratic Party and the Democrats as a whole have been complicit in this whole thing,” shouted one unnamed female protester, according to Fox News. The group gathered behind a large banner that read “Abortion on demand and without apology!” Above the illustrations of the five conservative Supreme Court justices was written the word “LIAR.”
“We are here because this draft decision is what it is, it’s only a draft, and we will protest here, in front of the leadership of the Democratic Party, and in the streets from coast to coast, unceasingly, because we work to keep abortion legal—legal and accessible, not rare,” the protester explained, outlining her plan to ratchet up the pressure on Democratic politicians to ensure the continued nationwide legality of abortion.
She also had some sharp criticisms for Hillary Clinton and the entire Democratic messaging effort on the issue since the ’90s.
“Hillary Clinton,” she declared, “who started the whole thing like abortion should be legal, but rare, as if abortion is a tragedy. We are here to say abortion is a basic right, a basic human right, and without this right, women are basically enslaved. And we will not stand for it.”
And she wasn’t at all happy with Pelosi downplaying the abortion issue in previous years, as when the current speaker of the House claimed in 2017 that abortion shouldn’t be a litmus test for the Democratic Party and that it was too focused on the issue. Another protester at the event threatened that Roe‘s downfall would remain Pelosi’s indelible legacy, erasing all her other liberal achievements.
“Speaker Pelosi,” he said, “this will be your legacy, 35 years of your reign of terror. You had a supermajority under Obama under which this should have been your top priority. Why did you keep this on the table? Because this is your most effective fundraising tool. That’s why.”
If there’s one thing the pro-life and pro-abortion crowds can agree on, it’s Nancy Pelosi’s 35-year reign of terror. The protester went on to chastise Pelosi for blaming Republicans when in fact the Democrats “control all three branches of government.” That last was a slight exaggeration, and presumably, he meant that they control the White House and both houses of Congress—the Supreme Court not currently being a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party, at least for now.
He then slammed the possible overthrow of Roe as a “blatant war on women, and other trans—uterus-bearing individuals.” The group appeared to be affiliated with the left-wing organization Ruth Sent Us, which had announced a plan to coordinate the descent of activists from various pro-abortion groups on Pelosi’s home to demand she investigate “corrupt justices” and rescue abortion.
Meanwhile, following the leak of Justice Alito’s draft opinion in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, pro-choice activists have become increasingly hostile, targeting the homes of Supreme Court justices in a thinly-veiled attempt to intimidate them and influence their ultimate decision in the ruling, which is not expected until later this summer.
Pelosi, who is a uterus-bearing individual, was pleased with this activity, and praised the protesters for expressing their “righteous anger.”
“While we have seen and heard extraordinary anguish in our communities,” she said on Monday, according to Fox News, “we have been moved by how so many have channeled their righteous anger into meaningful action: planning to march and mobilize to make their voices heard.”
No word on what she thinks about them making “their voices heard” in her front yard.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
"Originally from South Florida, Todd Jaquith now lives in sunny Santa Fe, New Mexico. He holds a degree in Anthropology from Florida Atlantic University."
- Senior editor at Vox fantasizes about Justice Alito’s death with creepy ‘obituary’ tweet - August 4, 2022
- John Kelly secretly listened to all of President Trump’s phone calls, Kushner alleges in book - August 4, 2022
- Sources suggest China could invade Taiwan before the 2024 US presidential election - August 4, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
18 thoughts on “Pro-abortion activists surround Pelosi’s house in bout of poetic justice”
Comments are closed.
Did she go out and give them all a small container OF ice cream?
A hysterectomy with every abortion and castrate the sperm donner. This will solve repeat offender and may detour abortions all together. Just saying
A TAD extreme, but given a REPEAT ENJOYER of abortion facilities is a drain on society your suggestion has merit!
I was tempted to suggest the same thing. The only reason I didn’t was because I don’t want people thinking I’m willing to tolerate unnecessary abortions to solve this problem.
Still, how do we make sure the right man gets castrated if we take this approach? I doubt he’d be going in if he knew this would happen, and I’m sure he’d be happy for his girl to take the heat on his behalf. Have a permanently available sex object, no more worrying about being responsible for what he does with her.
Nobody has the right to terminate a life simply by choice. The democrats riot when a black criminal is killed by police. Then they celebrate the death of black babies by the thousands.¹ There is an evil agenda here.
They need to throw eggs at her house!
What happened to “None’s home, go in and empty the house, take it to the Court House and set it on fire. Then set the house on fire, just as we said about Kavanaugh‘s house!”
No where in the constitution does it say a woman has a right to kill a child. If you stupid imbicilic girls don’t want to have babies, please keep your damn legs closed. Satan has a special place for you twits
I wonder what the left would do if pro-lifers protest at Sotomayor’s home to try to intimidate her into siding with the 4 judges who said they agree with what is in the draft. I think I know the answer the pro-lifers would be arrested, doxed and canceled because today we live a liberal fantasy land where evil is good and good is evil. And once again we see the left using violence, setting fire to a pro-life groups office. It is ok because hypocrisy.
These people are really unhinged. “Abortion is not a tragedy, it’s a right”. Too bad their parents were pro life.
You assume too much.
Don’t these idiotic abortion activists realize that they are preaching to the choir?
Pelosi is inciting pro baby killing mobs to break federal law. That is the definition of insurrection. Horrid witch, (and I apologize to real witches)
I remember when I was a young teen when abortion was legalized. We were fed the lie that it was analogous to wart removal. We were told it was compassionate to the few women who found themselves in tragic, untenable circumstances. We were told that it should be RARE and safe. My wise mother discussed the “slippery slope” with this. My mother promised that abortion would weed out of control. My mother explained how horny immoral boys and men are the true beneficiaries of abortion. Boy howdy. Mommy knew best.
She doesn’t care. She is in DC, not SF.
Pretty sure Ruth wouldn’t approve of this group using her name or a group of radical’s attacking her fellow Justice’s!
San Francisco huh…perfect. These are the ones that Joe would call Ultra Leftists. Keep showcasing them as they are radical nuts. It’s good that independents and middle of the roaders see the faces of true democrat anarchists.
I don’t see why exercising one’s rights is somehow immune to tragedy. The right to self-defense, these same people would’ve said a few years ago, can involve a tragedy. After all, I might still die, or the attacker might. But I do understand why they can’t let us see abortion as tragic, even if we bend the knee and call it a right. How would anyone sleep at night if he admitted he were guilty of snuffing out an innocent life just because? Most people aren’t psychopaths or sociopaths, and I imagine even most of those who are suffer some guilt when they murder someone. It’s bad enough to do it because of a legitimate need (something that almost never happens, and will be a thing of the past if we ever perfect the artificial womb), doing it “just because” is simply inhuman, and we know it. A lot of abortion practitioners hate the job, despite seeing it as necessary. The problem being, that just means this will get even more extreme, should they get their way. Not only will it convince them that their lawless tactics are worth using next time they feel the need, but their consciences will continue to ache, and they’ll need to do something worse to try to deal with the pain. A seared conscience likely hurts worse than any other.
It’s nice to see that wokeness’ complete and shameless lack of loyalty has finally come back to bite one of its most important proponents, though.