Psaki asks Doocy for examples of schools teaching kindergartners sex ed; he grills her on appropriate age

Fox News’ Peter Doocy grilled White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on what age the White House believes it’s appropriate to teach children about gender identity and sexual orientation.

During the Monday press conference, Psaki reiterated that the official stance of the White House was in opposition to Florida’s Parental Rights in Education law, which critics have erroneously dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” law.

“At what age does the White House think that students should be taught about sexual orientation and gender identity?” Doocy asked.

Psaki danced around the question.

Doocy followed up by asking whether the White House thinks it’s appropriate to have discussions around gender identity and sexual orientation with kids before Kindergarten, which seemed to turn Psaki to snark mode before her response.

“Do you have examples of schools in Florida that are teaching kindergarteners about sex education?” Psaki asked, eyebrows raised.

“I’m asking for the president’s opinion about-” Doocy explained before Psaki cut him off.

“I think that’s a relevant question because I think this is a politically-charged, harsh law that is putting parents and LGBTQ+ kids in a very difficult, heartbreaking circumstance,” Psaki explained before moving on to another question.

Twitter was not impressed:

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Sierra Marlee

Comment

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Subscribe
Notify of
39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dwightmann _fjb
Noble Member
Dwightmann _fjb
1 month ago

“I think that’s a relevant question because I think this is a politically-charged, harsh law that is putting parents and LGBTQ+ kids in a very difficult, heartbreaking circumstance,”
If children are not being subjected to nutty indoctrination, then the law will not change what they are being taught. If nothing changes, what new risks will there be by not teaching what they are already not being taught?

Greg
Noble Member
Greg
1 month ago

…the word I used below was “defication”

Latest Articles