House votes to hold Mark Meadows in criminal contempt for defying subpoena from political foes

Andrew Trunsky, DCNF

The House voted Tuesday to recommend criminal contempt of Congress charges against Mark Meadows, former President Donald Trump’s ex-chief of staff and a former House member, for defying a subpoena from the Jan. 6 Select Committee.

Meadows had originally cooperated with the committee, turning over thousands of texts, emails and other communications, but refused to meet with its members and to turn over direct communications with Trump after claiming executive privilege. The contempt motion passed 222-208 at about 11 p.m. with two Republicans voting alongside the unanimous Democratic caucus.

“It’s essential that witnesses cooperate with our investigation to get answers,” said Mississippi Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, the select committee’s chair. “The law requires them to do so. And when a witness defies the law, that amounts to more than an obstruction of investigation … It’s an attack on the rule of law.”

“This committee must get to the objective truth and ensure that January 6 never happens again,” added Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, the committee’s vice chair.

The full House vote followed a report released by the committee that painted Meadows as central to the effort to keep Trump in power despite his defeat to President Joe Biden. It said that Meadows praised an effort for state legislators to send alternate slates of electors to Congress and that he said the National Guard should be deployed to “protect pro Trump people” one day before the riot occurred. 

It also succeeded a unanimous committee vote Monday night that recommended criminal contempt. During the meeting the committee read several texts to Meadows from Donald Trump Jr. and Fox News hosts including Laura Ingraham, Brian Kilmeade and Sean Hannity urging him to tell Trump to condemn the rioters immediately.

“Mark, the president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home,” wrote Ingraham, according to the committee. “This is hurting all of us. He is destroying his legacy.”

Meadows defended his communications surrounding the Capitol riot, telling Newsmax that he had tried to work with the committee by sharing “nonprivileged information” with it. “They tried to weaponize text messages, selectively leaked them, to put out a narrative, quite frankly, that the president didn’t act.”

House Republicans, meanwhile, cast Tuesday’s vote as nothing more than vengeance against Trump from those politically opposed to him.

“The Democrats aren’t interested in finding out how a disorganized hoard of rioters managed to break into the Capitol,” said Indiana Republican Rep. Jim Banks. “They don’t want to learn about the security breakdown that day and they don’t care about preventing future attacks … They only care about attacking their political enemies.”

The recommendation now heads to the Department of Justice, which will decide whether to prosecute Meadows. He is the third that the House has charged with criminal contempt, joining former assistant attorney general Jeffrey Clark and former Trump adviser Stephen Bannon.

For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles