The Supreme Court stunningly rejected an emergency appeal from Maine healthcare workers, based on their constitutionally protected religious beliefs, to block a COVID vaccine mandate that went into effect on Friday.
Maine requires that healthcare workers all be vaccinated against a long list of diseases including COVID-19. According to The New York Times, in 2019 a law was passed that disallowed religious exemptions that would have circumvented the requirement.
The ruling was split 6 to 3 with Chief Justice John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, and Brett Kavanaugh voting with liberal justices against religious exemptions. Roberts and the three liberal justices did not author an opinion on the ruling. However, Barrett was joined by Kavanaugh in noting that the ruling to not grant injunctive relief on the vaccine mandate was at least partially due to the request coming via the “emergency docket” also known as the “shadow docket.”
A “shadow docket” hears emergency petitions without arguments and the high court is not required to issue explanations for why it granted or denied relief. Barrett contended that issuing an injunction “on a short fuse without benefit of full briefing and oral argument” would be inappropriate in this case. Her stance hints at her being open to ruling against the mandate if it came through the regular docket.
Barrett and Kavanaugh are so weak that they can’t even bring themselves to side with people who want religious exemptions from the vaccines!
RIP: the myth of a conservative majority on the Supreme Court. https://t.co/oxJIxu6OQe
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) October 29, 2021
She stated that the court has “discretionary judgment” on whether to take emergency appeals such as this one and claimed they were being asked to “grant extraordinary relief.” Barrett also denied an appeal from students at Indiana University to block that school’s vaccine mandate in August.
BREAKING: Justice Barrett denies emergency injunction request from Indiana Univ students challenging the school’s vaccine mandate. She could have referred the matter to the full Court, but acted alone and denied the request. #SCOTUS
— Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) August 12, 2021
Constitutional originalist Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas all dissented in the matter. Gorsuch made his opinion clear.
“This case presents an important constitutional question, a serious error, and an irreparable injury,” Gorsuch wrote. “Where many other States have adopted religious exemptions, Maine has charted a different course. There, healthcare workers who have served on the front line of a pandemic for the last 18 months are now being fired and their practices shuttered. All for adhering to their constitutionally protected religious beliefs.”
“Yet, with Maine’s new rule coming into effect, one of the applicants has already lost her job for refusing to betray her faith; another risks the imminent loss of his medical practice,” he added.
Gorsuch also stated that Maine’s decision to deny a religious exemption “borders on the irrational” and that the state had failed to present any evidence that granting the religious exemption “would threaten its stated public health interests any more than its medical exemption already does.”
“Their plight is worthy of our attention,” Gorsuch wrote. “I would grant relief.”
Democratic Gov. Janet Mills was the one who ordered Maine’s vaccine mandate. A federal judge in Maine declined to stop it, concluding that a lawsuit was unlikely to succeed, according to Fox News. The Oct. 13 decision prompted appeals that landed, for a second time, on the docket of the Supreme Court.
More than 2,000 unvaccinated healthcare workers were represented in the ensuing lawsuit by The Liberty Counsel. The healthcare workers argued that the vaccine mandate violates the Constitution and Title VII, which is a federal civil rights law that bars employment discrimination based on religion. While Maine offers a limited exemption in some medical instances, it does not consider requests for religious objections.
The ruling stirred anger on social media:
I’m hearing a very bad thing just happened at the Supreme Court.
Barrett and Kavanaugh ruling in favor of mask mandates with libs.
Preliminary report — let’s see if it plays out.
Bad. Bad. Bad.
— Benny (@bennyjohnson) October 29, 2021
The Gorsuch dissent was persuasive and he’s got a point. Meh. I don’t like what Maine is doing. What’s good for the goose type of deal.
— M. Peach (@Miss_Peeches) October 29, 2021
They don’t have the guts to stand up for us that is a major disappointment
— Jennifer Hausman (@JenniferHausm18) October 29, 2021
The base didn’t want milquetoast wonks on the bench.
We want right activists that will counter the leftest activists on the bench.
— Doctor Sekzi 🔥 ⚽️⭐♪ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ♪ (@DoctorSekzi) October 30, 2021
You can always depend on Justice Thomas to do the right thing, Alito most of the time, and Gorsuch. What’s happened to Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett? Roberts is no surprise but I had higher hopes for them.
— StillHaveHope1787 (@AnnBluegrass90) October 30, 2021
Yes, SCOTUS is broken too.
— Robert Neville (@OmegaMan58) October 30, 2021
They’re being coerced
— Politically Stripped ™️ 🇺🇸🗽 (@politstrip) October 30, 2021
that is so so wrong .. mandates are not laws and those 2 know this
— KIM (@MSREDMAMA1) October 29, 2021
Mandates are NOT laws!
— Philip Fulmer (@SFCFulmer) October 29, 2021
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- WaPo columnist uncorks doomsday take in racially infused diatribe: ‘Many will not survive’ - April 18, 2024
- Utah students walk out in protest of ‘furries’ allegedly allowed to harass them in school: ‘They bite… scratch us…’ - April 18, 2024
- NYPD dismantles illegal street vendors inundating AOC’s district, but many return with their shady merch - April 18, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!