Anything but intimate: Big stars flock to HUGE tents for ‘scaled-down’ version of Obama’s birthday bash

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

CHECK OUT for best SWAG!

After being bashed for scheduling a 500-person birthday party at Martha’s Vineyard amid the coronavirus surge being felt across the country, former President Barack Obama promised he’d scale it back because that would be the right thing to do.

“Due to the new spread of the Delta variant over the past week, the president and Mrs. Obama have decided to significantly scale back the event to include only family and close friends,” the former president’s spokesperson said earlier in the week.

However, emerging evidence seems to prove that he’d lied — as usual.

For one, it appears his so-called “close friends” include dozens upon dozens upon dozens of high-profile celebrities who were spotted by the Daily Mail arriving at Martha’s Vineyard on Friday.

They included singer John Legend, “canceled” TV star Chrissy Teigen, retired NBA star Dwyane Wade, race-baiting actress Gabrielle Union, rapper Jay-Z, rapper/singer Beyoncé, actor George Clooney, talk show host Oprah Winfrey, talk show host Stephen Colbert, etc., etc., etc.

Teigen is the TV star who was recently outed as a vicious bully.

The Daily Mail also spotted massive tents around the president’s summer home, which is reportedly where his 60th birthday party is slated to occur.


The Daily Mail managed to capture these photos before a drone ban went into effect just in time to prevent anyone from spying on the party the way Obama had spied on then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump’s 2016’s presidential campaign.

“Due to protective operations in Edgartown, MA, the Secret Service, in coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), has established a drone flight restriction from August 7, 2021 to August 8, 2021. … This restriction applies to all drones and drone pilots,” the Secret Service announced in a press release Friday.

Edgartown refers to the part of Martha’s Vineyard, which itself is a large island, that just conveniently also happens to be the location of Obama’s summer home.

While it’s possible this ban was instituted for privacy concerns, the public has latched on to other theories, one being that Obama is trying to prevent the public from seeing him and his guests hobnobbing with one another unmasked.

Another theory is that the drones are designed to stop the public from seeing even more “close friends” arriving on the island.


The evidence all points to Obama being awfully indifferent to concerns about the coronavirus pandemic, not to mention concerns about alleged man-made climate change.

During his presidency, he spent years lecturing the public about an alleged incoming climate change disaster and arguing that the only way to stave off this disaster was by instituting draconian regulations on the energy industry.

“If we don’t act boldly, the bill that could come due will be mass migrations, and cities submerged and nations displaced, and food supplies decimated, and conflicts born of despair,” he said in 2016, as reported at the time by Scientific American magazine.

Notice what he said about “cities submerged.” Because it’s situated on an island, it’s long been suspected by Obama’s beloved climate change “experts” that Martha’s Vineyard will be among the locations to be submerged one day.

“The famous islands of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket in Massachusetts are facing serious impacts from rising sea levels and more powerful coastal storms driven by climate change,” Boston station WBTS reported just this past week.

“The popular tourist destinations off Cape Cod risk losing hundreds of acres of marshlands to flooding and billions of dollars in coastal homes, buildings and infrastructure to erosion,” the station added, citing a new report.

This, of course,  has been known by “experts” for a long time, though it didn’t stop Obama from buying a summer home on Martha’s Vineyard two years ago.

This behavior fits among a consistent pattern of virtually ALL DEMOCRATS demanding the public abide by certain rules for such and such reason (the pandemic, climate change, etc.), but said Democrats then turning around and refusing to follow those same rules themselves.

In other words, rules for thee, but not for me.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles