Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
The far-left state of Oregon is being accused of “medical fascism” over reports that the state’s top health official has been considering making coronavirus restrictions for workplaces/businesses ostensibly “permanent.”
The proposal by Michael Wood, the administrator of the Oregon Department of Occupational Safety and Health, was made on Feb. 1st, but it’s just now receiving widespread attention from the media.
At the time, the Oregon OSHA published a press release claiming that, because of a technicality, the state’s current restrictions for businesses would expire unless the rule was made permanent.
#OregonOSHA is proposing a permanent rule that largely maintains (with some improvements) the risk-reducing measures required by the current temporary emergency rule. It would replace the temporary rule, which expires on May 4.
Read the full press release: https://t.co/Y6S8sWzSqQ pic.twitter.com/zIEAI91RyI
— DCBS (@OregonDCBS) February 1, 2021
However, the release promised that the rule would eventually be repealed the moment restrictions were “no longer necessary to address the effects of the pandemic in the workplace.”
“Although the rule must be adopted as a permanent rule because the law does not allow a temporary rule to be extended, Oregon OSHA expects to repeal the permanent rule once it is no longer needed to address the coronavirus pandemic,” it read.
In a statement, Wood argued that this step was necessary because Oregon had “not yet defeated” the coronavirus.
“The public health emergency triggered by COVID-19 remains a significant concern in Oregon – as we know, we have not yet defeated this disease and we clearly will not have done so by the time the temporary rule expires,” he said.
“As a result, it is critically important that we carry forward measures that we know are effective at combating the spread of this disease and reducing risks in the workplace. Failure to do so will undoubtedly leave workers far less protected and leave employers with far less clarity and certainty in terms of what is expected of them.”
A final decision won’t be made until May 4th. In the meantime, Wood briefly allowed comments from the public until April 2nd, and according to the Associated Press, the comments “from parents to teachers to business owners and employees” were overwhelmingly negative.
Tweets about the proposal have been equally negative, with some going so far as to accuse the state of engaging in “medical fascism”:
As mask mandates end, Oregon bucks trend with permanent rule.
— Charles Freedberg (@cbergmaga) April 18, 2021
— Guy Montag’s (Fahrenheit 451) Censored America (@451_guy) April 18, 2021
— Jorj X McKie (@jjs92285) April 17, 2021
“Repeal it when the pandemic is over” who is in charge of determining when that is for OR? Zero cases for 14 days? A month? 80% vaccination rate? Both? Meanwhile, states that value freedom let their healthy citizens decide if they need/want to wear a mask.
— SumMor (@LakeOswegomom) March 27, 2021
I’ll only endure this bull until I’m done with my degree and my family and I then will move to either South Dakota, north Dakota or Florida. I can’t stay in Oregon under this insanity.
— AngryPDXMom (@openpdxschools) March 27, 2021
I’m old enough to remember when “Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve” was the public policy rationale needed to keep hospitals from being overrun.
— Blumey (@Mikeblumey) April 18, 2021
Should be easy to social distance once every sane person leaves
— jl (@jl95511676) April 18, 2021
It doesn’t appear Wood even cares about the criticism, though.
“The majority of comments were simply hostile to the entire notion of COVID-19 restrictions. The vast majority of comments were in the context of, ‘You never needed to do anything,'” he dismissively said to the AP.
But complaints haven’t just been limited to random people. One was left by Justin Spaulding, a doctor at the Cataract & Laser Institute of Southern Oregon.
“I do not understand these new guidelines for business. If we put these into effect we will only continue to blunt the recent drop in business. We have a large subset of patients that are unwilling (or) hostile with the current guidelines, and making them permanent will only make it worse,” he reportedly wrote.
State Republicans have also spoken out.
“When will masks be unnecessary? What scientific studies do these mandates rely on, particularly now that the vaccine is days away from being available to everyone?” state Sen. Kim Thatcher reportedly said this past week.
“Businesses have had to play ‘mask cop’ for the better part of a year now. They deserve some certainty on when they will no longer be threatened with fines.”
If the rule does wind up becoming permanent, it’ll be a cookie-cutter copy of the original rule.
According to OSHA, the original rule had governed everything from social distancing to “use of face coverings; regular sanitation; employee notification and training; maximization and maintenance of existing ventilation systems; and formal exposure risk assessment and infection control planning.”
- Mayorkas admits Haitian migrants never tested for COVID: ‘We certainly had some individuals get sick’ - September 25, 2021
- Minnesota parents accuse school district of instructing students to roleplay as homosexuals - September 25, 2021
- Sen Marco Rubio introduces ‘Mind Your Own Business Act’ to stick it to woke corporations - September 25, 2021